Teachers’ Efforts in Understanding the Factual, Conceptual, Procedural and Metacognitive Assessment Using the Revised 2013 Curriculum

Hermayawati .

Abstract


This paper aims at analysing the efforts of forty teachers of the Madrasah Tsanawiyah School in Indonesia in understanding the Revised 2013 Curriculum (RC-13), particularly on how to implement the Factual, Conceptual, Procedural, and Metacognitive (FCPM) knowledge dimensions in assessments. This case study was carried out using the lecturing, discussion and implementation (LDI) approach to understand the RC-13 conceptually, discuss teachers’ problems and implement assessments using FCPM. The results of an in-depth observation and data analysis indicated that 30 out of 40 participants gained a better understanding on the RC-13 concept. They are now in a better position to know what should be done to prepare their RC-based instructional programs and they are conceptually able to implement the RC-13, except for the metacognitive dimension. The ten other teachers are still having some difficulties with FCPM as they did not have real classes such as Guidance Counselling, Sport and Health, and Scouting teachers. The results imply that teachers must be proactively trained to continually update their knowledge, particularly on curriculum development so that the quality of education can be improved.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.11


Keywords


Revised 2013 curriculum; LDI; FCPM

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, A. H., Mokhtar, M., Abd Halim, D. N., Ali, F. D., Tahir, M. L., Haiyat, U., & Kohar, A. (2016). Mathematics teachers’ level of knowledge and practice on the implementation of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 3-17. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00601a

Ahmad, K. (2018). The implementation of teaching LOTS and HOTS in English teaching-learning process in senior high school. RETAIN, 6(1), 121-128.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2000). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson.

Barratt-Pugh, C. (2015). Indonesian teachers’ implementation of new curriculum initiatives concerning teaching writing in lower primary school. International Journal of Education, 7(4), 53-72. doi:10.5296/ije.v7i4.8265

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.

Ekawati, Y. N. (2017). English teachers’ problems in applying the 2013 curriculum. English Review: Journal of English Education, 6(1), 41-48. doi:10.25134/erjee.v6i1.769

Gunawan, I. (2017). Indonesian curriculum 2013: Instructional management, obstacles faced by teachers in implementation and the way forward. In B. B. Wiyono, L. K. Hui, Y. Isao & I. Khan (Eds.), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education and Training (ICET 2017) Vol. 128. Batu-Malang Indonesia.

Gustafson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. Halmstad, Sweden: Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1064378/

Hariyadi, S., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S. I., & Ibrohim. (2017). The comparison of the question types in the RQA (reading, questioning, and answering) learning model and conventional learning model. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 4(7), 10-18. doi:10.20431/2349-0381.0407002

Hermayawati. (2017). Analysis of the English teachers' understanding in implementing the 2013 curriculum. In Saefurrohman, M. Winda, B. A. Suady, Suhandin, & A. S. Dadari (Eds.), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Education Conference, Vol. 109, (pp. 124-132), Purwokerto, Indonesia. doi:10.2991/aecon-17.2017.25

Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Rubric for Formal Oral Communication. Adapted from Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning, 156-157. Allyn & Bacon: Needham Heights, MA.

Kami Madrasah. (2019). Alokasi Waktu Mata Pelajaran K13 SMP, MTs, SMA, MA Tahun 2019 [Time allocation of C-13 subjects for secondary schools, MTs, MA, 2019]. Retrieved from https://kamimadrasah.blogspot.com/

Kemendikbud. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (Law Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System). Retrieved from http://hukum.unsrat.ac.id/uu/uu_20_03.htm

Kemendikbud. (2016). Revisi Kurikulum 2013, guru lebih dimudahkan (Revised Curriculum 2013, teachers are more facilitated). Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/

King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. M. S. (2016). Higher Order Thinking Skills: Definition, teaching strategies, assessment (A publication of the Educational Services Program, now known as the Centre for Advancement of Learning and Assessment), 1-177. Retrieved from https://informationtips.files. wordpress.com/

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Journal of Theory into Practice, The Ohio State University, 41(4), 212-218. Retrieved from https://www.depauw.edu/files/ resources/

Lobo, M. A., Moeyaert, M., Cunha, B. A., & Babik, I. (2017). Single-Case Design, Analysis, and Quality Assessment for Intervention Research. Journal of neurologic physical therapy, 41(3), 187-197.

Marlina, H. R., Puspaningrum, H., & Hamdani. (2017). Differentiation of Test Items between the High School Biology Olympiad in North Kayong and the National Science Olympiad. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 245-251.

Mohan, R. (2019). Innovative Science Teaching. Delhi, India: PHI Learning.

Palupi, D. T. (2018). What type of curriculum development models do we follow? Indonesia’s 2013 curriculum case. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 6(2), 98-105. doi:10.15294/ijcets.v6i2.26954.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing, 41(4), 219-225. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3

Ramdani, D. S., & Pangestu, A. (2018). Understanding SMK Teacher in curriculum implementation 2013 revision 2017 in Banten Province. Vanos: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 3(1). doi: 10.30870/vanos.v3i1.3690.

Roza, Y., Satria, G., & Syarifah, N. S. (2017). the development of e-tutorial on implementation national curriculum 2013 for the mathematics teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference. Series, 855(1), 1-9. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/855/1/012038

Seman, S. C., Wan, M., Yusoff, W., & Embong, R. (2017). Teachers challenges in teaching and learning for higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in primary school. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 7(7), 534-545. doi:10.18488/journal.1.2017.77.534.545 534-545

Sukasni, A., & Efendy, H. (2017). The problematic of Education System in Indonesia and Reform Agenda. International Journal of Education, 9(3), 183-199. doi:10.5296/ije.v9i3.11705

Suyanto, S. (2017). A reflection on the implementation of a new curriculum in Indonesia: A crucial problem on school readiness. C. Kusumawardani, A. M. Abadi, S. Suyanto, & I. Wilujeng (Eds.), AIP. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science (4th ICRIEMS) Vol. 1868, (pp. 1-9). Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Watson, S. (2020, March 8). Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Education. ThoughtCo. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/higher-order-thinking-skills-hots-education-3111297

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oa


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493