Teachers’ perspective of their role and student autonomy in the PBL context in China

Huichun Li

Abstract


The traditional role of the teacher confronts many challenges by an increasing number of educational initiatives that highlight student-centered learning in China, since the teacher’s role is in great need of transformation from instructor to facilitator. Therefore, it is quite necessary to examine how the teachers perceive their role within a context in the process of making educational innovations. This study relies on two Chinese universities which are changing their educational approach from lecture-based learning to PBL (Problem Based Learning). We examine how the teachers perceive their role in a PBL context. In particular, we are mainly concerned with how the teachers support student learning autonomy in PBL classes. It can be noted that the Chinese teachers have a tendency to maintain high interference in student learning process even though they admit the value of giving student learning autonomy. This study further implies a dilemma between teachers’ intention to encourage students to learn on their own and their tendency to maintain their directive role in the educational processes.


Keywords


Teachers’ perspective, teacher’s role, PBL, student autonomy, Chinese context

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barr, Robert B. and Tagg, John. (1995). From Teaching to Learning: A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education. Change, Vol.27, No.6.

Barrett, Terry and Moore, Sarah (2011, Eds.). New Approaches to Problem-Based Learning: Revitalising Your Practice in Higher Education. New York: Routledge

Barrows, H.S. (1986). A Taxonomy of Problem-based Learning Methods. Medical Education, 20, 481-486.

Bowe, Brian & Cowan, John (2004). A Comparative Evaluation of Problem Based Learning in Physics: A Lecture Based Course and A Problem Based Course. In Savin-Baden, Maggi (Eds.). Challenging Research in Problem Based Learning (pp. 161-173). Berkshire: McGrawHill Education.

Bowe, Brian (2007). Managing the Change from Traditional Teaching to Problem-based Learning in Physics Education. In Kolmos, A. and De Graaff, Erik (Eds.). Management of Change. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. 83-91.

Cohen, L. Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th edition). New York: Routledge.

Creswell, John (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.

De Graaff, Erik and Kolmos, Anette(2003). Characteristics of Problem-based Learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657-662

De Graaff, Erik, and Cowdroy, Rob (1997). Theory and Practice of Educational Innovation Introduction of Problem-based Learning in Architecture: Ttwo Case Studies. International Journal of Engineering Education, 13(3), 166-174.

Dolmans D. & Schmidt, H. (1996). The Advantages of Problem Based Curricula. Postgrad. Med. J. 72, 535-538

Gallagher, Shaun (1992). Hermeneutics and Education. SUNY Press.

Hofstede, G. (1986) Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301-320.

Kolmos, A. and De Graaff, Erik (2007). The Process of Change to PBL. In Kolmos, A. and De Graaff, Erik (Eds.). Management of Change. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. 31-44.

Savin-Baden, Maggi & Major, Claire. (2004). Foundations of Problem Based Learning. Berkshire: McGrawHill Education.

Savin-Baden, Maggi. (2003). Facilitating Problem-based Learning: Illuminating perspectives. The Society for Reseach into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Shao, Xiaofeng. (2007). Review on the Relation between Teachers and Students in China in Recent Ten Decades (åå¹´æ¥æˆ‘国师生关系观述评). Journal of Educational Studies. 3(5). 13-19

Song, Shengwen. (2009). Distance Creates Beauty: Authority Formulation of Young Teachers (å› è·ç¦»è€Œç¾Žâ€”—浅谈年轻ç­ä¸»ä»»å¨ä¿¡çš„æ ‘ç«‹). Science Education. (4): 79-80

Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97-110

Strobel, J. & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based learning. 3(1), 44-58.

Wang, G., Tai B., and Huang, C. et al. (2008). Establishing a Multidisciplinary PBL Curriculum in the School of Stomatology at Wuhan University. International Dental Education, 72(5), 610-615.

Wu, Yuejun. (2010). On the Traditional Relationship between Teachers and Students and the Modern Transformation (å¸ˆç”Ÿå…³ç³»ä¼ ç»ŸåŠå…¶çŽ°ä»£è½¬åž‹). Modern Education Management. (1),73-75

Zhao, Shuying. (2011). Maintain a Distance between Teacher and Student (教师与学生è¦ä¿æŒä¸€å®šçš„è·ç¦»). Education and Teaching Research. (34),64

Zhou Guang-li. (2007). Reconstruction of the Teacher-student Relationships in China’s Schools in the Transformational Age: Change and its Regulations (转型期中国师生关系的é‡æž„å˜é©åŠå…¶è§„制). Theory and Practice of Education. 27(7), 41-45

Zhou, Xingguo (2009). On Spirit of Teachers’ Occupational Dedication (论教师的èŒä¸šå¥‰çŒ®ç²¾ç¥ž). Contemporary Teacher Education. 2(1),77-81


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493