The Impact of the Academic Advising Style on the Development of an Academic Integrity Culture among Future PhD Candidates

Petro M. Boychuk, Olha L. Fast, Olha P. Shevchuk, Tetiana V. Horobets, Vasyl A. Shkoba

Abstract


Our research studied the impact of academic advising style on the development of a culture of academic integrity among PhD candidates. The study involved 52 postgraduate students and their 52 academic advisors. The results obtained were analyzed through general scientific methods. We used a closed-ended questionnaire to gather data from academic advisors, open-ended questions for postgraduate students, mathematical data processing techniques, and the Statistica software package to interpret data. The empirical data indicates that a pastoral academic advising style was applied by 17,3% of advisors, a laissez-faire style by 11,5%, a contractual style by 40,4%, and a directorial style by 30,8% of advisors in this study. Correlating these results with data on postgraduate students’ level of academic integrity culture lead to the conclusion that the contractual style of academic advising could be regarded as the most beneficial for raising the level of academic integrity culture of postgraduate students (33,3% of students of advisors with this style had a high level of academic integrity culture). The weakest style for improving the level of academic integrity culture of students is the pastoral style (11,1%). Moreover, it is obvious that most academic advisors (40,4%) use the mutually beneficial contractual style. The quantitative increase of advising style indicators corresponding to the contractual type entails higher values for students’ academic integrity culture. The relationship between advising style and level of academic integrity culture is not linear, and we cannot argue that an academic advisor with a contractual leadership style adheres to all the desirable principles of academic integrity culture. Further investigations are required if more specific and diversified conclusions are to be made. Furthermore, we should take into account that other members of the academic staff also have an impact on the formation and improvement of the academic integrity culture of postgraduate students.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.4.16


Keywords


postgraduate studies; training PhD candidates; academic advisor; scientific advising styles; academic integrity culture; education quality assurance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agné, H., & Mörkenstam, U. (2018). Should first-year doctoral students be supervised collectively or individually? Effects on thesis completion and time to completion. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1453785

Artyukhov, A., Liuta, O. (2017). Academic integrity in Ukrainian higher education: values, skills, actions. Business Ethics and Leadership, 1(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.2017.1-04

Bretag, T. (2018, April 26). Academic integrity. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.147

Cockrell, C. N., & Shelley, K. (2011). The relationship between academic support systems and intended persistence in doctoral education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 12(4), 469–484.

Faucher, D., & Caves, S. (2009). Academic dishonesty: Innovative cheating techniques and the detection and prevention of them. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 4(2), 37-41. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2008.09.003

Gamage, K. A. A., Silva, E. K. D., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery and assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding academic integrity. Education and Science, 10, 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110301

Gatfield, T. (2005). An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(3), 311–325.

Gray, P. W., & Jordan, S. R. (2012). Supervisors and academic integrity: Supervisors as exemplars and mentors. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(4), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9155-6

Igumbor, J. O., Bosire, E. N., Karimi, F., Katahoire, A., Allison, J. A., Muula, S. A., Peixoto, A., Otwombe, K., Gitau, E., Bondjers, G., Fonn, S., & Ajuwon, A. (2020). Effective supervision of doctoral students in public and population health in Africa: CARTA supervisors’ experiences, challenges and perceived opportunities. Global Public Health, 16(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1864752

Jili, N. N., & Masuku, M. M. (2017). Supervision as a tool of producing independent researchers: Reflecting on supervision processes. Ponte Academic Journal, 73(8). https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2017.8.25

Kuklina, V. (2006). The figure of the scientific supervisor and PhD thesis in the biography of a young humanist. Communitas, 2, 106–115.

Kvit, S. (2020, March 9). The national agency for higher education quality assurance for protecting academic integrity in Ukraine. Serhiy Kvit’s personal journal. https://kvit.ukma.edu.ua/2020/03/the-national-agency-for-higher-education-quality-assurance-for-protecting-academic-integrity-in-ukraine/

Murphy, N., Bain, J. D., & Conrad, L. (2007). Orientations to research higher degree supervision. Higher Education, 53(2), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). OECD reviews of integrity in education: Ukraine 2017. OECD.

Piekhota, O. & Yermakova, I. (2013). ОÑнови педагогічних доÑліджень [Fundamentals of pedagogical research]. Znannia.

Qureshi, R., & Neelofar, V. (2016). Pedagogy of research supervision pedagogy: A constructivist model. Istraživanja u Pedagogiji, 6(2), 95–110.

Reheilo, I. Y., & Bazeliuk, N. V. (2015). ОÑÐ²Ñ–Ñ‚Ð½Ñ Ñкладова в докторÑьких програмах у галузі оÑвіти ГарвардÑького універÑитету [Coursework in the Harvard University doctoral programs in education]. Вища оÑвіта в Україні/Higher Education of Ukraine, 3(2), 41-48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301549006_Osvitna_skladova_v_doktorskih_programah_u_galuzi_osviti_Garvardskogo_universitetu

Rezvan, O., Volkova, N., Kozhushko, S., & Marusynets, M. (2020). Problems of academic dishonesty in higher education: ways of its preventing and eliminating. Espacios, 41(28), 194–206.

Sefcik, L., Striepe, M., & Yorke, J. (2019). Mapping the landscape of academic integrity education programs: what approaches are effective? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1604942

Semenog, O. (2016). Ðкадемічна культура Ñк фундаментальна чаÑтина підготовки кандидатів наук за ÑпеціальніÑÑ‚ÑŽ 015 «ПрофеÑійна оÑвіта» [Academic culture as a fundamental part of training PhDs in the speciality 015 Professional education]. Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko.

Semenog, O., & Vovk, M. (2016). Ðкадемічна культура доÑлідника в оÑвітньому та культурному проÑторі універÑитету [Academic culture of the explorer in the educational and cultural space of the university]. Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko.

Sheard, J., Morgan, M., Petersen, A., Settle, A., & Sinclair, J. (2018, January). Informing students about academic integrity in programming. In R. Mason & Simon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference, Brisbane, Australia (pp. 113-122). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3160489.3160502

Simola, S. (2017). Managing for academic integrity in higher education: Insights from behavioral ethics. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000076

Sobhagyawati, G. (2017). Emerging trends and technology in knowledge management. Prateeksha Publications.

Talanova, Z. V. (2010). ДокторÑька підготовка у Ñвіті та в Україні [Doctoral training in the world and in Ukraine]. Millennium.

Ukrstat. (2020). Higher education in Ukraine in 2019. Statistical information. http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2005/osv_rik/osv_u/vysh_osvita/arch_vysh_osvita.htm

Zerchaninova, T. E. & Tarbeeva, I. S. (2020). The role of the supervisor in the scientific and educational activities of the graduate student. Research Result. Series: Sociology and Management, 6(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-2-0-10


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493