The Role of Non-Academic Service Quality in an Academic-Oriented Context: Structural Equation Modeling amongst Parents of Secondary Education Students
Abstract
In the education sector, the academic factor is considered the primary focus when assessing the service quality of schools. However, the traditional approach to service quality proposes that the supplemental indicators of quality are just as important in meeting customer expectations. As parents of secondary school students are not directly involved in the academic service of the school, non-academic factors (e.g., administrative quality [ADQ] and physical environment quality [PEQ]) can be considered alternative service quality indicators, subsequently affecting their satisfaction and loyalty. Using data obtained from a survey questionnaire with 230 parents of secondary education students in Vietnam, this study examined non-academic service factors as antecedents of parent satisfaction and loyalty. Results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) yielded two factors under the non-academic service dimension: PEQ and ADQ. Results of the structural equation modeling (SEM) showed that while PEQ affects loyalty both directly and indirectly, ADQ affects loyalty only indirectly through satisfaction. Implications for stakeholders, including school principals and policymakers, have been drawn from the findings of this study.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.8.13
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bloemer, J., De Ruyter, K., & Peeters, P. (1998). Investigating drivers of bank loyalty: The complex relationship between image, service quality and satisfaction. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16(7), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652329810245984
Brandano, M. G., Osti, L., & Pulina, M. (2019). How motivations and satisfaction influence wine tourists’ loyalty? An analysis of the Italian case. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 13(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-04-2018-0054
Eid, M. (2011). Determinants of e-commerce customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(1), 78–93. http://www.jecr.org/sites/default/files/12_1_p05.pdf
Eid, R. (2015). Integrating Muslim customer perceived value, satisfaction, loyalty and retention in the tourism industry: An empirical study. International Journal of Tourism Research, 17(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.1982
Epstein, J., Osborne, R. H., Elsworth, G. R., Beaton, D. E., & Guillemin, F. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.013
Fantuzzo, J., Perry, M. A., & Childs, S. (2006). Parent Satisfaction with Educational Experiences Scale: A multivariate examination of parent satisfaction with early childhood education programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.04.002
Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408177
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5). Pearson. https://www.amazon.com/Multivariate-Data-Analysis-Joseph-Hair/dp/0138132631
Hallowell, R. (1996). The relationships of customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, and profitability: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7(4), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239610129931
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
Hemsley-Brown, J., Lowrie, A., Gruber, T., Fuß, S., Voss, R., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2010). Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: Using a new measurement tool. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011022474
Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 26(3), 329–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124198026003003
Kamran-Disfani, O., Mantrala, M. K., Izquierdo-Yusta, A., & Martínez-Ruiz, M. P. (2017). The impact of retail store format on the satisfaction-loyalty link: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 77, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.004
Kandampully, J., & Suhartanto, D. (2000). Customer loyalty in the hotel industry: The role of customer satisfaction and image. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 12(6), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110010342559
Kardoyo, K., Pitaloka, L. K., Rozman, R., & Hapsoro, B. B. (2019). Analyzing universities service quality to student satisfaction; academic and non-academic analyses. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p126
Kasiri, L. A., Guan Cheng, K. T., Sambasivan, M., & Sidin, S. M. (2017). Integration of standardization and customization: Impact on service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.11.007
Kassim, N. M., Najdawi, M., Al Azmeh, Z., & Sadiq, H. (2010). Effects of institutional reform on corporate image and value in a developing country context. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(2), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041011047849
Kaura, V., Durga Prasad, C. S., & Sharma, S. (2015). Service quality, service convenience, price and fairness, customer loyalty, and the mediating role of customer satisfaction. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(4), 404–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2014-0048
Lan Anh. (2015). Giáo d?c mu?n phát tri?n ph?i c?nh tranh [Competition is required for the development of education]. Vietnamnet. https://vietnamnet.vn/vn/tuanvietnam/giao-duc-muon-phat-trien-phai-canh-tranh-274106.html
Lee, S. Y. (2017). Service quality of sports centers and customer loyalty. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(4), 870–879. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-10-2016-0191
Li, C. K., & Hung, C. H. (2009). Marketing tactics and parents’ loyalty: The mediating role of school image. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(4), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230910967455
lin, C., & Tsai, Y. H. (2008). Modeling educational quality and student loyalty: A quantitative approach based on the theory of information cascades. Quality & Quantity, 42(3), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9051-5
Loh, C. Y. R., & Teo, T. C. (2017). Understanding Asian students learning styles, cultural influence and learning strategies. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 7(1), 194–210. https://www.jespnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_1_March_2017/23.pdf
Mohammad Mosadeghrad, A. (2013). Healthcare service quality: Towards a broad definition. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 26(3), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526861311311409
Mulyono, H., Hadian, A., Purba, N., & Pramono, R. (2020). Effect of service quality toward student satisfaction and loyalty in higher education. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 929–938. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.929
Nguyen, P. (2019). T? ch? trong giáo d?c ph? thông là xu th? t?t y?u [Autonomy in secondary education is an inevitable trend]. Nhan Dan. https://www.nhandan.com.vn/hangthang/item/41735702-“tu-chu-trong-giao-duc-pho-thong-la-xu-the-tat-yeu”.html
Nichols, A. L., & Maner, J. K. (2008). The good subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. The Journal of General Psychology, 135(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.135.2.151-166
Pham, H.-H., & Lai, S. L. (2016). Higher education as an extended duration service. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(5), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315316662978
Pham, H.-H., Lai, S. L., & Vuong, Q.-H. (2019). The role of subjective task value in forming satisfaction and loyalty among Vietnamese international students: A structural equation model. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(5), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00439-3
Rolfsman, E. (2020). Swedish students in the process of transition to upper secondary education: Factors of importance for educational choice and for their future. Education Inquiry, 11(4), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1746480
Savolainen, H., Ahonen, T., Aro, M., Tolvanen, A., & Holopainen, L. (2008). Reading comprehension, word reading and spelling as predictors of school achievement and choice of secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.017
Sharif, K., & Kassim, N. M. (2012). Non-academic service quality: Comparative analysis of students and faculty as users. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 22(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2012.705793
Sultan, P., & Yin Wong, H. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293070
Teeroovengadum, V., Kamalanabhan, T. J., & Seebaluck, A. K. (2016). Measuring service quality in higher education: Development of a hierarchical model (HESQUAL). Quality Assurance in Education, 24(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-06-2014-0028
Teeroovengadum, V., Nunkoo, R., Gronroos, C., Kamalanabhan, T. J., & Seebaluck, A. K. (2019). Higher education service quality, student satisfaction and loyalty: Validating the HESQUAL scale and testing an improved structural model. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-01-2019-0003
Vuong, Q.-H. (2020). Reform retractions to make them more transparent. Nature, 582(7811), 149–149. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01694-x
Wiers-Jenssen, J., Stensaker, B., & Gr?gaard, J. B. (2002). Student satisfaction: Towards an empirical deconstruction of the concept. Quality in Higher Education, 8(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832022000004377
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493