The Impact of Teacher Feedback Via Google Doc in L2 Learners’ Writing

Mohammed Abdullah Alharbi, Abdulrahman Alqefari

Abstract


Academic writing of assignments is challenging for many undergraduate students of English, and therefore, instructors' written evaluative comments are needed to help students obtain information about their performance in such academic written tasks. As a qualitative case study, this study was carried out on one undergraduate course, specifically on the instructor's written comments on 10 learners' peer academic writing of article reports, how students revise their texts in responding to written comments and how they view such comments and academic writing via Google Docs. The data was collected from the written comments, students’ text revisions and a focus group interview. The findings show that the instructor commented on issues and errors at the global and local levels of academic texts directly and indirectly. Quantification of the data illustrated that the instructor provided the five pairs of learners with an overall number of 1440 which targeted 373 (25%) global issues and 1067 (75%) local issues in the writing of the five pairs. In terms of direction, 977 (68%) accounted for direct feedback, while 463 (32%) accounted for indirect feedback. Distribution of the feedback received by the learners varied across the five pairs of students. The findings indicate that most of the learners’ text revisions were made based on teacher feedback (1187/93%), while only 95 (7%) revisions were self-made revisions. The thematic analysis of the follow-up interview underlies students’ perceived value of teacher feedback in improving their writing, their preference for direct feedback on their writing, their perceived role of Google doc in editing their written assignments. Yet, a few students reported a few restrictions of Google Dos-peer writing and editing. The current study implied that teachers should act as mediators, be aware of the role of feedback in facilitating their students’ development of writing and misinterpretation and confusion their feedback can cause to our students in the process of writing revision, and decide what issues their feedback needs to target, focus on what issues actually challenge their learners in writing. Finally, feedback practices should be made innovative through integration of technological tools. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.11.10


Keywords


academic writing; peer writing; Google Docs-commenting; responses; perception

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agbayahoun, J. P. (2016). Teacher Written Feedback on Student Writing: Teachers' and Learners' Perspectives. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0610.01

Al Badi, I. A. H. (2015). Academic writing difficulties of ESL learners. In The 2015 WEI international academic conference proceedings, 1(1), 65-78.

???Alharbi, M. A. (2019). Saudi Arabia EFL university students’ voice on challenges and solution in learning academic writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 576-587.? https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15276

Alharbi, M. A. (2020). Exploring the potential of Google Doc in facilitating innovative teaching and learning practices in an EFL writing course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(3), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1572157

Ali, A. D. (2016). Effectiveness of Using Screencast Feedback on EFL Students' Writing and Perception. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p106

Alkhatib, N. (2015). Written corrective feedback at a Saudi university: English language teachers’ beliefs, students’ preferences, and teachers’ practices. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex].??

Al-Mukdad, S. (2019). Investigating English academic writing problems encountered by Arab International University students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(3), 300-306. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0903.07

Alsubaie, J., & Ashuraidah, A. (2017). Exploring Writing Individually and Collaboratively Using Google Docs in EFL Contexts. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 10-30.? https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p10

Alvarez, I., Espasa, A., & Guasch, T. (2012). The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.510182

Ariyanti, A., & Fitriana, R. (2017). EFL students’ difficulties and needs in essay writing. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 158, 111-121. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-17.2017.4

Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers' reflections on their practices. Teaching in higher education, 15(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620019

Baker, J. (2019). Writing about the writing center in the Asian context: Exploring the mis/match between the reading levels of self-access materials and the students who visit the center. The Asian ESP Journal, 15(3), 256-285.

Bijami, M., Pandian, A., & Singh, M. K. M. (2016). The Relationship between teacher's written feedback and student's' writing performance: Sociocultural perspective. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 4(1), 59-66.?????

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language teaching research, 12(3), 409-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089924

Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. New York: Pearson.

Chandler, J. (2000). The efficacy of error correction for improvement in the accuracy of L2 student writing. Paper presented at the AAAL conference, Vancouver, B. C.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(03)00038-9

Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Teacher written feedback on English as a foreign language learners’ writing: Examining native and nonnative English-speaking teachers’ practices in feedback provision. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629921

Chong, S. W. (2019). College students’ perception of e-feedback: a grounded theory perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1090-1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1572067

Chu, S., Kennedy, D., & Mak, M. (2009). 'MediaWiki and Google Docs as online collaborative tools for group project co-construction'. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management, (pp. 1–14). Hong Kong. December, 3-4.

Conrad, S. M., & Goldstein, L. M. (1999). ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of second language writing, 8(2), 147-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80126-x

Diab, N. M. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter? Assessing Writing, 24, 16-34.???

Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787-815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056

Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005

Enginarlar, H. (1993). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System, 21(2), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251x(93)90041-e

Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hylangd & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 81–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple?draft composition classrooms. TESOL quarterly, 29(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587804

Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. Tesol Quarterly, 31(2), 315-339.

Ferris, D. R. (2014). Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices. Assessing Writing, 19, 6-23.?

Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. (2013). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Routledge.

Ferris, D. R., Chaney, S. J., Komura, K., Roberts, B. J., & McKee, S. (2000). Perspectives, problems & practices in treating written error. In colloquium presented at International TESOL Convention, Vancouver, BC.

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?. Journal of second language writing, 10(3), 161-184.

Gillow-Wiles, H., & Niess, M. L. (2015). Engaging Google Docs to Support Collaboration and Reflection in Online Teacher Education. In Handbook of research on teacher education in the digital age (pp. 635-662). IGI Global.

Harran, M. (2011). What higher education students do with teacher feedback: Feedback-practice implications. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 29(4), 419-434. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2011.651941

Hedin, B. (2012). Peer feedback in academic writing using Google Docs. In Proceedings of LTHs 7: ePedagogiska Inspirations konferens, (pp. 1–3). Lund.

Hidayat, F. (2020). Exploring students’ view of using Google Docs in writing class. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 184-194. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.2.184-194

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of second language writing, 7(3), 255-286.

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(03)00021-6

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of second language writing, 10(3), 185-212. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350037939.0036

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Interpersonal aspects of response: constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 206-224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524742.013

Irwin, B. (2017). Written Corrective Feedback: Student Preferences and Teacher Feedback Practices. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.22492/ijll.3.2.02

Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (2015). The effects of teacher-written direct vs. indirect feedback on students’ writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.018

Junqueira, L., & Payant, C. (2015). “I just want to do it right, but it's so hard”: A novice teacher's written feedback beliefs and practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 19-36.? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.001

Khalil, Z. M. (2018). EFL students’ perceptions towards using Google Docs and Google Classroom as online collaborative tools in learning grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(2), 33-48.?

Köksal, D., Özdemir, E., Tercan, G., Süleyman, G. Ü. N., & B?LG?N, E. (2018). The relationship between teachers’ written feedback preferences, self-efficacy beliefs and burnout levels. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 316-327.

Kurzer, K. (2018). Dynamic written corrective feedback in developmental multilingual writing classes. TESOL quarterly, 52(1), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.366

Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001

Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. Tesol Quarterly, 48(1), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.153

Leont'ev, A. A. (1981). Psychology and the language learning process. Pergamon.?

Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011

Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31, 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001

Mahmood, R., Shah, A.H. & Alam, I. (2020). The Impact of L1 on L2 in Academic English Writing: A Multilingual Dilemma of Pakistani Students. English for Specific Purposes, 16(5), 67-80.

Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback:(Mis) alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 46-60.??? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004

Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C. M. (2007). Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104.

Mohammed, M. A. S., & AL-Jaberi, M. A. (2021). Google Docs or Microsoft Word? Master's students' engagement with instructor written feedback on academic writing in a cross-cultural setting. Computers and Composition, 62, 102672.

Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019). Using Google Docs for peer-then-teacher review on middle school students’ writing. Computers and Composition, 54, 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524

Saeed, M. A., & Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2020). Exploring teacher interactive e-feedback on students’ writing through Google Docs: factors promoting interactivity and potential for learning. The Language Learning Journal, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786711

Saeed, M. A., Al-Ahdal, A. A. & Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2020). Integrating research proposal writing into a postgraduate research method course: what does it tell us? International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2020.1777963

Saliu-Abdulahi, D., Hellekjær, G. O., & Hertzberg, F. (2017). Teachers' (formative) feedback practices in EFL writing classes in Norway. Journal of Response to Writing, 3(1), 31-55.

Semeraro, J., & Moore, N. S. (2016), "The Use of Google Docs Technology to Support Peer Revision". In Writing Instruction to Support Literacy Success (Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation, Vol. 7, pp. 203-220), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-045820160000007013

Silver, R., & Lee, S. (2007). What does it take to make a change? Teacher feedback and student revisions. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(1), 25-49.

Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (2014). The effects of collaborative writing activity using Google Docs on students’ writing abilities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 148-156.

Tamimi, M. H. (2017). Integrating Web 2.0 technologies in learning: Using Facebook group and BYKI in English language courses. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 17, 85-108.

Tiyingdee, A., & Jaroongkhongdach, W. (2016, May). Written comments on drafts of an independent study: A case study. In The 7th International Conference on Language and Communication (p. 17). Osaka University, Japan.

Treglia, M. O. (2009). Teacher-written commentary in college writing composition: How does it impact student revisions? Composition Studies, 37(1), 67-86.

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language learning, 46(2), 327-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wolsey, T. (2008). Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 311–329.

Woodard, R., & Babcock, A. (2014). Designing Writing Tasks in Google Docs that Encourage Conversation: An Inquiry into Feedback and Revision. In Handbook of Research on Digital Tools for Writing Instruction in K-12 Settings (pp. 1-29). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5982-7.ch001

Woodrich, M., & Fan, Y. (2017). Google Docs as a tool for collaborative writing in the middle school classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 391-410. https://doi.org/10.28945/3870

Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493