Factors Inducing Literature Anxiety for Students Studying Literature in English

Agnes Wei Lin Liau, George Boon Sai Teoh

Abstract


Students have been plagued with various types of anxieties in the educational context, hence we propose to introduce the concept of literature anxiety in this study. This study investigates the possible factors inducing literature anxiety from the perspectives of university students studying Literature in English at tertiary level, and records their emotional experiences during their learning encounters with Literature in English. The study also presents how these students make sense of their Literature in English learning and how their knowledge and perceptions of Literature in English have influenced or affected their experience of literature anxiety. SPSS analysis of the data procured through the Literature Anxiety Scale (LITAS) provided evidence concerning students’ literature anxiety and the factors they perceive inducing literature anxiety for them. The literature anxiety-inducing factors were identified as situational, dispositional, and environmental factors. The findings obtained showed that students’ literature anxiety does debilitate their studying of Literature in English. The implications are that educators should teach more attentively and be sensitized to learners’ possible experience of anxiety.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.11.11


Keywords


academic achievement; emotional experiences; literature anxiety; Literature in English; literature learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aydin, S. (2016). A qualitative research on foreign language teaching anxiety. The Qualitative Report, 21(4), 629-642. https://doi.org/10.57643/2160-3175/2016.2232

Balo?lu, M. (2003). Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 855-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00076-4

Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001

Cheng, Y. S. (2017). Development and preliminary validation of four brief measures of L2 language-skill-specific anxiety. System, 68, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.009

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Sage.

Deieso, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2018). Learning environment, attitudes and anxiety across the transition from primary to secondary school mathematics. Learning Environment Research, 22, 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9261-5

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.

Endler, N. S., & Kocovski, N. L. (2001). State and trait anxiety revisited. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 15(3), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-6185(01)00060-3

Horowitz, E. K., Horowitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/327317

Huang, H.-T. D. (2018). Modeling the relationships between anxieties and performance in second/foreign language speaking assessment. Learning and Individual Differences, 63, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.03.002

Jiang, Y., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2020). The predictive power of sociobiographical and language variables on foreign language anxiety of Chinese university students. System, 89, 102207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102207

Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2020). Breaking the vicious cycle of language anxiety: Growth language mindsets improve lower-competence ESL students’ intercultural interactions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101847

Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s141421

Macintyre, P. D. (1995). How does anxiety affect second language learning? A reply to Sparks and Ganschow. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05418.x

Martinussen, L. J., Šaltyt? Benth, J., Almdahl, I. S., Borza, T., Selbæk, G., Mcpherson, B., & Korsnes, M. S. (2019). The effect of anxiety on cognition in older adult inpatients with depression: Results from a multicenter observational study. Heliyon, 5(8), e02235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02235

Neuman, L. A. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

Ohata, K. (2005). Language anxiety from the teacher’s perspective: Interviews with seven experienced ESL/EFL teachers. Journal of Language and Learning, 3(1), 133–155.

Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement (New ed.). Continuum.

Putwain, D. W., Connors, L., & Symes, W. (2010). Do cognitive distortions mediate the test anxiety-examination performance relationship? Educational Psychology, 30(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903328866

Reardon, T., Harvey, K., Young, B., O’Brien, D., & Creswell, C. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to parents seeking and accessing professional support for anxiety disorders in children: Qualitative interview study. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(8), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1107-2

Salza, A., Giusti, L., Ussorio, D., Casacchia, M., & Roncone, R. (2020). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) anxiety management and reasoning bias modification in young adults with anxiety disorders: A real-world study of a therapist-assisted computerized (TACCBT) program vs. “person-to-person” group CBT. Internet Interventions, 19, 100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100305

Spielberger, C. D., & Vagg, P. R. (Eds.). (1995). Test anxiety: Theory, assessment and treatment. Taylor & Francis.

Zaccoletti, S., Altoè, G., & Mason, L. (2020) Enjoyment, anxiety and boredom, and their control-value antecedents as predictors of reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 79, 101869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101869


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493