Assessing for Learning: Teacher Training in Practice Involving 14 Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) Students

Elize (E. C.) Du Plessis

Abstract


In this age of answerability, assessment is a dominant factor that can either promote or weaken learners’ education internationally. Yet many of the usual practices followed by institutions show that assessments in the classroom continue to be a challenge for teachers. This signifies that assessment is either not well understood or not done effectively during all stages of education. The study reported in this article attempted firstly to detect how prepared teachers were to perform assessments for learning, and secondly to enhance teachers’ assessment practices. It focused on the qualities of good assessment practices, different methods of assessment, types of assessment, and feedback and assessment to enhance learning in the classroom. A qualitative approach was used, involving 14 participants who had completed a postgraduate certificate in education (PGCE) at a distance teaching institution. Results revealed inter alia a need for longer teaching practice periods, the use of taxonomies on different cognitive levels, and subject-specific workshops. It is recommended that more practical examples, like lecture videos, taxonomies, and rubrics, should be employed, and assessment processes should embrace technology.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.11.19


Keywords


assessing for learning; feedback; teacher training; teaching practice; types of assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alberta Education. (2008). Types of Classroom Assessment. http://www.learnalberta.ca/content/mewa/html/assessment/types.html

Algonquin College. (2019). Qualities of Good Assessment Practices. Professor’s Resource. https://www.algonquincollege.com/profres/assessing-learners/qualities-of-good-assessment-practices/

Andrade, H. L., & Cizek, G. J. (Ed). (2010). Handbook of formative assessment. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Ayala, C. C., Shavelson R. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., Young, D. B., & Tomita, M. K. (2008). From formal embedded assessments to reflective lessons: The development of formative assessment studies. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957340802347787

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2001). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. https://weaeducation.typepad.co.uk/files/blackbox-1.pdf

Booyse, C., Du Plessis, E. C., & Maphalala, M. (2020). Curriculum studies in context. 4th edition. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Burns, M. (2005). Looking at how students reason. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 26-31.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: Educational research – planning, conducting and evaluating qualitative and quantitative research (4th ed.) New York: Pearson.

DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. A. (2010). Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17(4), 419-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.516643

DeLuca, C., Willis, J., Cowie, B., Harrison, C., Coombs, A., Gibson, A., & Trask, S. (2019). Exploring the Complex Dynamics of Assessment Education in Teacher Education Across Four Countries. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2019.00132/full

Elton, L. (2002). Good assessment practice. Society for Research into Higher Education, 6, 106-135.

Federation University. (2019). Types of feedback. https://federation.edu.au/staff/learning-and-teaching/teaching-practice/feedback/types-of-feedback

Fink, D. L. (2003). A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://inside.southernct.edu/sites/default/files/a/inside-southern/faculty-development/Self-Directed_Guide_to_Course_Design_-_Sept_10.pdf

Frey, B. B. (2018). Feedback Intervention Theory. The SAGE Encyclopaedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/ 9781506326139.n261

Friesen, S., Saar, C., Park, A., Marcotte, C., Hampshire, T., Martin, B., Brown, B., & Martin, J. (2015). Focus on Inquiry. https://inquiry.galileo.org/ch3/assessment-within-discipline-based-inquiry/

Hattie, J. (2016). Visible learning. http://visible-learning.org/john-hattie/

Khan, A. (2019). Meaning and Types of Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.toppr.com/bytes/types-of-assessment/

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, M. (2014). Research in education: evidence-based inquiry. 7th ed. Pearson New International Edition. Boston: Pearson.

McNamee, G. D., & Chen, J. (2005). Dissolving the Line between Assessment and Teaching. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 72-76.

Measom, C. (2019). How to Be a Confident Teacher. http://work.chron.com/confident-teacher-1707.html

Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. New York: Sage Journals.

Ministry of Education. (2020). What is assessment for learning? http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Assessment-for-learning/Underlying-principles-of-assessment-for-learning/What-is-assessment-for-learning

National Foundation For Educational Research (NFER) Report. (2007). Getting started with Assessment for Learning. https://cambridge-community.org.uk/professional-development/gswafl/index.html

NFER. (2007). NFER position paper on assessment. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/nfer-position-paper-on-assessment-2007

Ngulube, P. (2018). Overcoming the Difficulties Associated with Using Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks in Heritage Studies. https://www.google.com/search?q=Ngulube%2C+P.+2018.+Overcoming+the+Difficulties+Associated+with+Using+Conceptual+and+Theoretical+Frameworks+in+Heritage+Studies&rlz=1C1CHZL_enZA778ZA778&oq=Ngulube%2C+P

NVSD Curriculum Hub. (2018). 10 Principles of Assessment. https://www.sd44.ca/District/Communicating/Assessment%20Handbook/Assessment%20Handbook%202018.pdf

Olivia, N. (2017). What is Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research? https://www.coursehero.com/file/p46d3mf/2017-Establishing-Trustworthiness-in-Qualitative-Research

Oltmann, S. M. (2016). Qualitative interview: a methodological discussion of the interviewer and respondent contexts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), Art. 15. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1602156

Pellegrino, J. W. (Ed). (2014). Developing Assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards Washington. The National Academies Press (NAP) publishes the reports of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Wills, K., & Sands, D. I. (2012). Developing and Evaluating Instructionally Sensitive Assessments in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 691-712. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258670010_Developing_and_Evaluating_Instructionally_Sensitive_Assessments in_Science

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning (CSE Technical Report 517). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.588.4254&rep=rep1&type=pdf

South Africa’s Education Statistics. (2020). https://www.southafricanmi.com/education-statistics.html

Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2020). Interpretivism. https://methods.sagepub.com/foundations/interpretivism

Umalusi. (2020). Quality assurance report. https://www.umalusi.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Nov-2019-DBE-QAA-Report-FINAL.pdf

Van der Nest, A., Long, C., & Engelbrecht, J. (2018). South African Journal of Education, 38(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1382

Wiley, C. R. H. (2008). Traditional teacher tests. In TL Good (ed). 21st Century education: A reference handbook (Vol. 1). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493