Theoretical Models of Integration of Interactive Learning Technologies into Teaching: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
With the fast progress of technology and the vast amount of research papers related to technology integration in education being published yearly, a study that reviews models used in these papers is needed. Therefore, this paper (1) reviewed and analysed theoretical frameworks with models used for integration of technology in classrooms, (2) reviewed studies that discussed the impact of technology integration on students’ learning capabilities, and (3) discussed the importance of preparing teachers to effectively integrate technology in teaching. The models reviewed were: Teacher Thoughts and Action Process (TTAP), Theory of Planned Behavior, Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation (EVAM), Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR), Technology Acceptance (TAM), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), and Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK).
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.12.14
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10011527857/
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969889
Angelo, S. M. (2017). Educators' perceptions of the substitution, augmentation, modification, redefinition model for technology integration. Northern Colorado: ProQuest LLC. https://search.proquest.com/openview/20acff786525cebe77a7c0b1c61aa2ce/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Avci, Z. Y., O'Dwyer, L. M., & Lawson, J. (2020). Designing effective professional development for technology integration in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 160-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12394
Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2016). The influence of TPACK contextual factors on early childhood educators’ tablet computer use. Computers & Education, 98, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.010
Brown, J. P. (2017). Teachers' perspectives of changes in their practice during a technology in mathematics education research project. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.022
Castéra, J., Marre, C. C., Yok, M. C., Sherab, K., Impedovo, M. A., Sarapuu, T., Pedregosa, A. D., Malik, S. K., & Armand, H. (2020). Self-reported TPACK of teacher educators across six countries in Asia and Europe. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3003-3019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10106-6
Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2020). A dictionary of media and communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780198841838.001.0001
Cheng, S., Lu, L., Xie, K., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2020). Understanding teacher technology integration from expectancy-value perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103062
Chou, C. C., Block, L., & Jesness, R. (2012). A case study of mobile learning pilot project in K-12 schools. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0502.02
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Ellis, J., Dare, E., & Roehrig, G. (2016). From consumers to creators: Adventures learning and its impact on pre-service teachers' TPACK and technology integration. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2834-2841.
Goh, E., & Wen, J. (2020). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand hospitality management students’ intentions to use electronic discussion boards as a learning tool. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 21(2), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2020.1768621
Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365-374. https://jise.org/volume15/n4/JISEv15n4p365.html
Haines, K. (2016). Expanding the knowledge base of teachers' use of communication tools for language learning. System, 62, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.008
Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2016). Teaching in flipped classrooms: Exploring pre-service teachers' concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.022
Hardman, J. (2019). Towards a pedagogical model of teaching with ICTs for mathematics attainment in primary school: A review of studies 2008–2018. Heliyon, 5(5), e01726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01726
Hargis, J., Cavanaugh, C., Kamali, T., & Soto, M. (2014). A federal higher education iPad mobile learning initiative: Triangulation of data to determine early effectiveness. Innovative Higher Education, 39(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-013-9259-y
Harris, J., & Hoffer, M. J. (2014). The construct is in the eye of the beholder: School districts'. SITE 2014-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference., 2519-2526.
Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., &Lunzer, E. (2002). The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA). https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=ut-QP28AAAAJ&citation_for_view=ut-QP28AAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C
Heitink, M., Voogt, J., Verplanken, L., Van Braak, J., & Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers’ professional reasoning about their pedagogical use of technology. Computers & Education, 101, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.009
Hood, M., Creed, P. A., & Neumann, D. L. (2012). Using the expectancy value model of motivation to understand the relationship between student attitudes and achievement in statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v11i2.330
Johnston, K., Hadley, F., & Waniganayake, M. (2019). Practitioner inquiry as a professional learning strategy to support technology integration in early learning centres: Building understanding through Rogoff’s planes of analysis. Professional Development in Education, 46(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1647871
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technological and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/29544/
Koh, J. H., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for pedagogical improvement: Editorial for special issue on TPACK. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 459-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0241-6
Mahini, F., Forushan, Z. J., & Haghani, F. (2012). The importance of teacher's role in technology-based education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1614-1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.348
Miguel-Revilla, D., Martínez-Ferreira, J. M., & Sánchez-Agustí, M. (2020). Assessing the digital competence of educators in social studies: An analysis in initial teacher training using the TPACK-21 model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5281
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Pavlou, V. (2019). Art technology integration: Digital Story tellying as a transformative pedagogy in primary education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(1), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12254
Peterson, P. L., & Clark, C. M. (1978). Teachers’ reports of their cognitive processes during teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 555-565. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312015004555
Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. V., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
Shulman, L. S. (2013). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Journal of Education, 193(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300302
Stockwell, G., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Engaging in mobile phone-based activities for learning vocabulary: An investigation in Japan and Taiwan. CALICO Journal, 32(2), 299-322. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i2.25000
Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020). Using an extended technology acceptance model to understand students’ use of e-learning during COVID-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11), e05410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410
Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Wamba, S. F., & Dwivedi, R. (2021). The extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
Terada, Y. (2020). A powerful model for understanding good tech integration. https://www.collegeforbishops.org/s/SAMR_-A-Powerful-Model-for-Understanding-Good-Tech-Integration-_-Edutopia.pdf
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2019). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009
United Arab Emirates. (n.d.). Sustainable development knowledge platform. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/memberstates/unitedarabemirates
Vanduhe, V. Z., Nat, M., & Hasan, H. F. (2020). Continuance intentions to use gamification for training in higher education: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM), social motivation, and task technology fit (TTF). IEEE Access, 8, 21473-21484. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2966179
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Woo, H., Dondanville, A., Jang, H., Na, G., & Jang, Y. (2020). A content analysis of the counseling literature on technology integration: American Counseling Association (ACA) counseling journals between 2000 and 2018. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 42(3), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-020-09406-w
Yeh, Y., Hsu, Y., Wu, H., & Chien, S. (2017). Exploring the structure of TPACK with video-embedded and discipline-focused assessments. Computers & Education, 104, 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.006
Young, J. R., Young, J. L., & Hamilton, C. (2013). The use of confidence intervals as a meta-analytic lens to summarize the effects of teacher education technology courses on preservice teacher TPACK. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 149-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782617
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493