Defining Formative Electronic Assessment in Undergraduate Mathematics: A Reflective Approach

Benjamin Tatira, Israel Kariyana

Abstract


Formative electronic assessment of mathematics on the Learning Management System is unique. The purpose of this study was to delineate the process of formative assessment in mathematics through the students’ experiences during remote online learning. Formative assessment is part of learning and helps students to monitor their progress. Data were analysed by identifying themes from the narratives. It emerged that the e-assessments that are manually written and graded by the instructor were the best mode of assessment for undergraduate mathematics. With timely feedback, formative electronic assessment placed students in a position whereby they took more responsibility for their learning. As such, students had positive perceptions towards formative electronic assessment during remote e-learning and were prepared to proceed with it in future. The study concluded that while some students proclaimed to have the expertise in the use of e-assessments, most students did not have the expertise in using e-assessment tools, as formative e-assessments were not generally offered in other modules. Participants echoed the sentiments that instructor expertise in formative electronic assessment design should be unquestionable to promote enhanced mathematics assessments that should enable presenting the steps taken to arrive at the answers.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.7.2


Keywords


formative assessment; electronic assessment; undergraduate students; e-learning; mathematics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alrabai, F. (2017). Exploring the Unknown: The Autonomy of Saudi EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 222-233. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n5p222

Apricio, M., Bação, F. & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-Learning Theoretical Framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 292-307.

Baleni, Z. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 228-236. http://www.ejel.org

Boitshwarelo, B., Reedy, A.K., & Billany, T. (2017). Envisioning the use of online tests in assessing twenty-first century learning: a literature review. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039- 017-0055-7

Bradford, P. & Porciello, M. (2007). The Blackboard Learning System: The Be All and End All in Educational Instruction? Journal of Educational Technology Systems. https://doi.org/10.2190/X137-X73L-5261-5656

Buzzetto-More, N.A. & Alade, A.J. (2006). Best Practices in e-Assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 251-269. https://doi.org/10.28945/246

Camilleri, M.A. (2021). Shifting from traditional and blended learning approaches to a fully virtual and remote course delivery: Implications from COVID-19. Academia Letters, 481. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL481

Caspari-Sadeghi, S., Forster-Heinlein, B., Maegdefrau, J. & Bachl, L. (2021). Student-generated Questions: Developing Mathematical Competence through Online-Assessment. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2021.150108

Charteris, J., Quinn, F., Parkes, M., Fletcher, P. & Reyes, A. (2018). e-Assessment for learning and performativity in higher education: A case for existential learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2595

Chen, Z., Jiao, J., & Hu, K. (2021). Formative Assessment as an Online Instruction Intervention: Student Engagement, Outcomes, and Perceptions. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa1

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 5th Ed. Sage.

Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128

Einig, S. (2013). Supporting students' learning: The use of formative online assessments. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 22(5), 425-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2013.803868

Elzainy, A., El Sadik, A., & Al Abdulmonem, W. (2020). Experience of e-learning and online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic at the College of Medicine, Qassim University. J Taibah Univ Med Sc, 15(6), 456-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.09.005

Fontanillas, R., Carbonell, M.R., & Catasús, M.G. (2016). E-assessment process: giving a voice to online learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0019-9

Iannone, P. (2020). Assessing mathematics at university: Covid-19 and beyond. Newsletter of the London Mathematical Society, 490, 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1112/NLMS

Koneru, I. (2017). Exploring Moodle functionality for managing open distance learning e-assessments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340402

Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2021). Experiencing e-assessment during COVID-19: an analysis of Indian students’ perception. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-03-2021-0032

Marpa, E. P. (2021). Technology in the teaching of mathematics: An analysis of teachers’ attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal on Studies in Education, 3(2), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.36

Merriam, S. B. (2009) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley and Sons.

Oliver, E. (2018). Change agency and higher education in South Africa. HTS Theological Studies, 74(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i3.5133

Prieto, N.J., Martin, K.J., Colmenar, J.M., Martinez-ortiz, I. & Hidalgo, J.I. (2012). iTest: Online assessment and self-assessment in mathematics. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/17415651011071622

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L. & Koole, M. (2020). Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity. Postdigit Sci Educ 2, 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

Rudman, R. J. (2021). Understanding the unintended consequences of online teaching. South African Journal of Higher Education, 35(4), 1-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/35-4-4717

Sangwin, C. (2013). Computer- Aided Assessment of Mathematics. Oxford University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262933216_Computer-aided_assessment_in_mathematical_sciences

Sikurajapathi, I., Henderson, K., & Gwynllyw, R. (2020). Using e-Assessment to Address Mathematical Misconceptions in Engineering Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.5.1389

Sosibo, Z.C. (2019). Self-assessment: A learner-centred approach towards transforming traditional practices and building self-directed learners. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(5), 76-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/33-5-3586

Stone, D. E., & Zheng, G. (2014). Learning management systems in a changing environment. In V. C. X. Wang (Ed.), Handbook of research on education and technology in a changing society (pp. 756–767). IGI Global.

Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R. & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454-476. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215

Xu, H., & Mahenthiran, S. (2016). Factors that Influence Online Learning Assessment and Satisfaction: Using Moodle as a Learning Management System. International Business Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v9n2p1


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493