Effect of Blended Learning Models and Self-Efficacy on Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability

Muhammad Jamaluddin, Mustaji Mustaji, Bachtiar S. Bahri

Abstract


The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of the flipped-classroom and flex blended learning models in enhancing the mathematical problem-solving ability of junior high school students. The quasi-experimental pre- and post-test method was used to carry out this research. The sample consisted of 128 students divided into two equal groups (n1 = n2 = 64). Self-efficacy data were collected through a questionnaire, while problem-solving ability was evaluated using validated mathematics problem test-sets. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyze the data, with the independent variables comprising the learning model (flipped and flex) and self-efficacy (low and high). The dependent was the post-problem-solving ability score, and the pre-test was the covariate. The test results showed that participants in the flipped class group obtained a final problem-solving ability score greater than those in the flex group after the initial score was controlled (p < 0.001), with a large effect size of w2 = 0.382. Although self-efficacy was a significant factor in the final test score (p = 0.001, w2 = 0.134), the interaction with learning models was insignificant (p = 0.226). This shows that students will increase their math problem-solving ability test scores in flipped and flex classes regardless of their self-efficacy level. In conclusion, the flipped classroom technique can be implemented to enhance mathematical problem-solving abilities among Grade 8 students with low or high self-efficacy. To ensure a successful learning process, variances in cognitive capacity, learning medium, objectives, and students’ emotional qualities also need to be considered.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.7.7


Keywords


blended learning; flex model; flipped classroom; problem-solving; self-efficacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aboraya, W. (2021). Assessing students’ learning of abstract mathematical concepts in a blended learning environment enhanced with a web-based virtual laboratory. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(3), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135520

Adamu, I., & Hawamdeh, M. (2020). The flex model of blended learning enabled digital citizenship. In F. Alt?nay & Z. Alt?nay (Eds.), Online pedagogy and management for smart societies (pp. 25–35). Ankara Pegem Akademi Yay?nc?l?k. https://depo.pegem.net/9786257052498.pdf

Amri, S., & Widada, W. (2019). The role of self-efficacy and mathematics ability in the problem solving mathematics [Conference proceedings]. International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018), 295. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icetep-18.2019.17

Anthony, E. (2019). (Blended) learning: How traditional best teaching practices impact blended-elementary classrooms. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 25–48. https://www-learntechlib-org.cupdx.idm.oclc.org/p/183933/

Arifin, S., Wahyudin, W., & Herman, T. (2021). The effect of students’ mathematics self efficacy on mathematical understanding performance. ?lkö?retim Online, 20(1), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.52

Aspelmeier, J. (2005). Table of critical values for Pearson’s r. https://www.real-statistics.com/statistics-tables/pearsons-correlation-table/

Awosdeyi, A. F., Akpan, E. T., & Udo, I. J. (2014). Enhancing teaching and learning of mathematics: Adoption of blended learning pedagogy in University of Uyo. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(11), 40–45. https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v3i11/T0NUMTQ2Njc=.pdf

Ayob, N., Halim, N. D. A., Zulkifli, N. N., & Zaid, N. M. (2020). Overview of blended learning: The effect of station rotation model on students’ achievement. Journal of Critical Review, 7(6), 320–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.06.56

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth Publishers.

Beaver, J. K., Hallar, B., Westmaas, L., & Englander, K. (2015). Blended learning: Lessons from best practice sites and the Philadelphia context. Philadelphia education research consortium. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED570360.pdf

Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 48(5), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4

Bringula, R., Reguyal, J. J., Tan, D. D., & Ulfa, S. (2021). Mathematics self?concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID?19 pandemic. Smart Learning Environments, 8(22), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00168-5

Carreira, S., Jones, K., Amado, N., Jacinto, H., & Nobre, S. (2016). Youngsters solving mathematical problems with technology (Vol. 5). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24910-0

Chen, M. J., Lee, C. Y., & Hsu, W. C. (2015). Influence of mathematical representation and mathematics self-efficacy on the learning effectiveness of fifth graders in pattern reasoning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 13(1), 1?16. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/277

Chen, S.-C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hsiao, C. C. (2016). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1096–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12278

Chiu, M., Yeh, H., & Whitebread, D. (2014). Student constructs of mathematical problems: Problem types, achievement and gender. Cogent Education, 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2014.961252

Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2013). Is K-12 blended learning disruptive? An introduction to the theory of hybrids. Clayton Christensen Institute All.

Chytrý, V., Medová, J., ?í?an, J., & Škoda, J. (2020). Relation between pupils’ mathematical self-efficacy and mathematical problem solving in the context of the teachers’ preferred pedagogies. Sustainability, 12(23), 10215. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310215

Çikr?kci, Ö. (2017). The effect of self-efficacy on student achievement. In E. Karadag (Ed.), The factors effecting student achievement (pp. 95–116). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56083-0

Clark, K. R., & Falls, W. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91–115.

Cronin, S., & Coakley, D. (2018). Innovating vocational education: Flipped classroom. Erasmus. https://mek.oszk.hu/19700/19778/19778.pdf

Doménech-Betoret, F., Abellán-Roselló, L., & Gómez-Artiga, A. (2017). Self-efficacy, satisfaction, and academic achievement: The mediator role of students’ expectancy-value beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01193

Fazal, M., & Bryant, M. (2019). Blended learning in middle school math: The question of effectiveness. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 49–64. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1208816.pdf

Fernández-Martín, F.-D., Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M., Gómez-García, G., & Ramos Navas-Parejo, M. (2020). Impact of the flipped classroom method in the mathematical area: A systematic review. Mathematics, 8(12), 2162. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122162

Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design research in education and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Goos, M., Donoghue, J. O., Ní, M., Fiona, R., Tony, F., & Niamh, H. (2020). Designing a national blended learning program for “out?of?field” mathematics teacher professional development. ZDM, 52, 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01136-y

Guo, H. W., Huang, Y. S., Lin, C. H., Chien, J. C., Haraikawa, K., & Shieh, J. S. (2016). Heart rate variability signal features for emotion recognition by using principal component analysis and support vectors machine [Conference proceedings]. 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2016.40

Horn, M. B., Staker, H., & Christensen, C. M. (2014). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Intaros, P., Inprasitha, M., & Srisawadi, N. (2014). Students’ problem solving strategies in problem solving-mathematics classroom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4119–4123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.901

Jazuli, A., Setyosari, P., Sulthon, & Kuswandi, D. (2017). Improving conceptual understanding and problem-solving in mathematics through a contextual learning strategy. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 49–53. http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/vol19no1/07-Jazuli-A.pdf

Kennedy, E. (2021). Blended learning in teacher education & training: Findings from research & practice. European Schoolnet. https://www.europeanschoolnetacademy.eu/downloads/Blended Learning in Teacher Education %26 Training - EUNA Thematic Seminar Report.pdf

Kerlinger, F. (2006). Foundation of behavioral research. CBD College Publishing.

Kirisci, N., Sak, U., & Karabacak, F. (2020). The effectiveness of the selective problem solving model on students’ mathematical creativity: A Solomon four-group research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100719

Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

Lin, Y. W., Tseng, C. L., & Chiang, P. J. (2017). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a

Loch, B., & Borland, R. (2014). The transition from traditional face-to-face teaching to blended learning: Implications and challenges from a mathematics discipline perspective. https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/dunedin2014/files/concisepapers/278-Loch.pdf

Lopes, A. P., & Soares, F. (2018, March 5–7). Flipping a mathematics course: A blended learning approach [Conference session]. INTED2018 Conference, Valencia, Spain.

Mulyono, & Hadiyanti, R. (2018). Analysis of mathematical problem-solving ability based on metacognition on problem-based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012157. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012157

Mundt, F., & Hartmann, M. (2018). The blended learning concept of math: Practical insights and research findings. In J. Silverman, & V. Hoyos (Eds.), Distance learning, e-learning and blended learning in mathematics education (pp. 11–28). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90790-1_2

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school matematics. https://www.nctm.org/

OECD/ADB. (2015). Education in Indonesia: Rising to the challenge. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-in-indonesia_9789264230750-en

Pajares, F, & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0991

Park, J. H., & Han, T. I. (2018). The effect of flipped learning on problem-solving capability in software education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(4), 304–307. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.4.1052

Purwoko, R. Y., Nugraheni, P., & Instanti, D. (2019). Implementation of pedagogical content knowledge model in mathematics learning for high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1254(1), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012079

Rafiola, R. H., Setyosari, P., Radjah, C. L., & Ramli, M. (2020). The effect of learning motivation, self-efficacy, and blended learning on students’ achievement in the Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(08), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i08.12525

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., Abdullah, N. A., Kakudi, H. A., Ali, A. S., Musa, A. S., & Yahaya, A. S. (2020). Self-regulated learning in flipped classrooms: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(11), 848–853. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.11.1469

Razm, F., Naderi, F., & Dashtbozorgi, Z. (2021). Effectiveness of flipped teaching and problem-solving methods on problem-solving ability and sense of responsibility among female high school students. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory, 3(12), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.22034/iepa.2021.281955.1264

Roehl, A. M. Y., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1045858

Salleh, F. I. M., Baharum, H. I., & Shamsudin, S. (2017). Comparative study between flipped learning and flex model in English as second language classroom. Advanced Science Letters, 23(4), 2663–2666. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7611

Santos-Trigo, M. (2014). Problem solving in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 496–501). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_129

Sari, I. K., Nasriadi, A., Agustiani, R., & Nursalim, R. (2021). Analysis of students’ mathematical problem-solving skills method. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 48(9). https://jonuns.com/index.php/journal/article/view/705/702

Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.

Sengul, S., & Katranci, Y. (2012). Problem solving and problem posing skills of prospective mathematics teachers about the ‘sets’ subject. International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology, 69, 1650–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.111

Setiana, D. S., Purwoko, R. Y., & Sugiman. (2021). The application of mathematics learning model to stimulate mathematical critical thinking skills of senior high school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.509

Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351043991

Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. Internet and Higher Education, 36, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.003

Triana, R., Jamilatus, T., & Nikmaturrohmah, P. (2021). Profile of students’ problem-solving skills viewed from Polya’s four-steps approach and elementary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1625–1638. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1625

Tynan, B., Willems, J., & James, R. (2013). Outlooks and opportunities in blended and distance learning. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4205-8

Vanek, J., Simpson, D., & Goumas, J. (2020). IDEAL distance education and blended learning handbook (7th ed.). EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/ideal_dl_handbook

Wiginton, B. L. (2013). Flipped instruction: An investigation into the effect of learning environment on student self-efficacy, learning style, and academic achievement in an algebra I classroom. University of Alabama.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493