Linking Teachers' Profiles to their Capability in Curriculum Implementation: Analysis of Factors that Shape and Influence EFL Classes
Abstract
An analysis of teachers' profiles and their influence on the curriculum implementation of English taught as a foreign language (EFL) constitutes the crux of the study. Teachers' profiles provide a gauge of their capability in curriculum implementation. Policies have been conceptualised to facilitate the seamless and smooth interaction between the teacher's role and task, and to ensure that the curriculum is implemented according to its goals and objectives. However, when teachers' profiles do not meet the requirements, and the policies do not facilitate the teachers' task, challenges arise that impact the teaching–learning process. Thus, this study analysed teachers’ profiles and the influence of these profiles on teachers’ curriculum implementation. The survey design captured 57 EFL teachers' profiles and their beliefs and perceptions about implemented policies. The findings reveal that most of these teachers had an intermediate proficiency level and more than a decade of teaching experience, and most taught at high school level in urban areas. Pedagogically, teachers employed communication-driven activities; however, certain conditions, such as big classes, insufficient time, and limited resources, were factors that may have affected the effective facilitation of the implementation of the English component of the curriculum. Teachers' profiles and institutional support are key factors that influence the outcome of policy implementation. Having an appropriate professional profile in the teaching pool and providing the appropriate pedagogical and curriculum support is pivotal to curriculum implementation of teaching a foreign language such as English in a predominantly Spanish-speaking country such as Ecuador.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.26
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bunch, G. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12461772
Burgin, X., & Daniel, M. C. (2017). Exploring English language teaching in an Ecuadorian urban secondary institution. GIST: Education and Learning Research Journal, (14), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.364
Butler, Y. G. (2004). What level of English proficiency do elementary school teachers need to attain to teach EFL? Case studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 245–278.
Constante, S. (2016, September 19). Ecuador busca profesores de inglés [Ecuador is looking for English teachers]. El País. https://bit.ly/3dcbjSe
Council of Europe. (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Council for Cultural Co-operation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division. Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. www.coe.int/lang-cefr
Primicias. (2019, December 11). Ecuador tiene el peor nivel de inglés de América Latina [English has the worst level of English in Latin America]. Primicias.ec. https://www.primicias.ec/noticias/sociedad/idioma-ingles-estudiantes-convenio-educacion-profesores/
SENESCYT. (n.d.). En EEUU ya se habla de Go Teacher [In the US there is already talk of Go Teacher]. Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. https://www.educacionsuperior.gob.ec/en-eeuu-ya-se-habla-de-go-teacher/.
Fraga?Cañadas, C. P. (2010). Beyond the classroom: Maintaining and improving teachers' language proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 43(3), 395–421.
Jaekel, N., Schurig, M., Florian, M., & Ritter, M. (2017). From early starters to late finishers? A longitudinal study of early foreign language learning in school. Language Learning, 67(3), 631–664.
Locastro, V. (2001). Large classes and student learning. TESOL quarterly, 35(3), 493-496.
Mihaljevi? Djigunovi?, J., & Lopriore, L. (2011). The learner: Do individual differences matter? In J. Enever (Ed.), ELLiE: Early language learning in Europe (pp. 29–45). British Council.
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2019). Plan de estudios para el nivel de Educación General basica ?Curriculum for the basic General Education Level?. https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2019/12/Modelo-malla-curricular-carga-horaria.pdf
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2018). Acuerdo Nro. MINEDUC-2018-00051-A ?Agreement Number. MINEDUC-2018-00051-A?. https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2018/05/MINEDUC-2018-00051-A.pdf
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (n.d.). Currículo 2016: lengua extranjera [Foreign language curriculum]. https://educacion.gob.ec/curriculo-lengua- extranjera/
NCGEFL. (2016). National curriculum guidelines for English as a foreign language. https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2013/04/Curriculum_Guidelines-EFL-1.pdf
Rama, J. L., & Agulló, G. L. (2012). The role of the gramamar teaching: from communcative approaches to the common european framework of reference for languages. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 7(1), 179-192.
Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and performance in language teaching. RELC Journal, 41(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210372953
Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (1999). Communicative language teaching (CLT): Practical understandings. The Modern Language Journal, 83(4), 494–517.
Troudi, S., Coombe, C., & Al-Hamly, M. (2009). EFL teachers' views of English language assessment in higher education in the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 546–555.
Vold, E. T. (2017). Qualifying foreign language teachers: Is teacher training enough? International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 40–53.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493