Evaluating the Accreditation Results of Christian Colleges in Indonesia Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Model
Abstract
Accreditation is an external quality assurance system authorized institutions use to provide formal recognition. Christian colleges in Indonesia, which have been around for decades, should be able to have excellent accreditation. There are still very few Christian colleges that are accredited with excellence while very many Christian colleges are well-accredited. The purpose of this study is to identify the conformity of the Good Accredited Christian College (GACC) target with the results of the accreditation assessment, analyze the recommendations given by the evaluators in the results of the accreditation assessment, and produce GACC strategies in improving the quality of education to have competitiveness. Mixed-method with qualitative and quantitative approaches were used in this study. The evaluation with model Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) is used as design research. The evaluation results show that GACC can improve accreditation quality and status by considering the accreditation assessment matrix requirements as a different strategy. GACC must strive to meet the standard of excellence in each component of the accreditation instrument to be able to compete nationally and internationally.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.11.14
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alstete, J. (2007). College Accreditation: Managing Internal Revitalization and Public Respect. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601932
Altschuld, J. W., & Engle, M. (2015). The Inexorable Historical Press of the Developing Evaluation Profession. New Directions for Evaluation, 2015(145), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/EV.20108
Amirtharaj, S., Chandrasekaran, G., Thirumoorthy, K., & Muneeswaran, K. (2021). A Systematic Approach for Assessment of Attainment in Outcome-based Education Higher Education for the Future, 9(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/23476311211017744
Andrade, M. S. (2018). A Responsive Higher Education Curriculum: Change and Disruptive Innovation. Innovations in Higher Education - Cases on Transforming and Advancing Practice. https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.80443
Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi [National Accreditation Board for Higher Education] (2019). Attachment to BAN-PT Regulation Number 3 of 2019 concerning Higher Education Accreditation Instruments. Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. https://www.banpt.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Lampiran-6f-PerBAN-PT-3-2019-Matriks-Penilaian-IAPT-3_0-PTV-PTN-BLU.pdf
Chen, W., Gregg, A., & Palm, D. (2018). Longitudinal Evaluation of Quality Improvement and Public Health Accreditation Readiness in Nebraska Local Health Departments, 2011-2016. Public Health Reports, 133(3), 250–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918754542
Du Plessis, E. E. C. (2021). Assessing for Learning: Teacher Training in Practice Involving 14 Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) Students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(11), 346–365. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.11.19
Dumanig, F. P., & Symaco, L. P. (2020). Internationalisation of higher education in Malaysia and the Philippines: a comparative analysis of mission and vision statements of selected universities., Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1735401
Farley-Ripple, E., May, H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018). Rethinking Connections Between Research and Practice in Education: A Conceptual Framework. Educational Researcher, 47(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761042
Ito, H. (2021). Quality Education or Defense of Accreditation? The Struggle of a University Professor Leading an Education Committee. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 25(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554589211052074
Johnson, S. (2021). Evaluation design. Australian Institute of Family Studies. https://aifs.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication-documents/2106_evaluation_design_0.pdf
KEMDIKBUD. (2022). Profil Perguruan Tinggi. KEMDIKBUD. https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/
Ma, A., & Hsuan S. (2021). Assessing the Effects of University Reputation and City Image on International Student Destination Choice: Evidence from a Flagship University in Taipei: Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/00131245211013844. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245211013844
Meyer, M., Neumayr, M., & Rameder, P. (2019). Students’ Community Service: Self-Selection and the Effects of Participation: Education and Urban Society, 48(6), 1162–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019848492
Nallbani, S. (2013). The Role Of Human Resource Management With Special Qualifications Provided For Enhancing The Quality Of Higher Education In Kosovo. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, IV(6).
Omodan, B. I., & Ige, O. A. (2021). Sustaining collaborative learning among university students in the wake of COVID-19: The perspective of online community project. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(1), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.20.1.20
Owusu, A. A. (2022). Determinants of Quality Education Delivery in Selected Public Universities in Ghana: Students’ Perceptions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.2.8
Quimbo, M. A. T., & Sulabo, E. C. (2014). Research productivity and its policy implications in higher education institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1955–1971. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818639
Sorrentino, K. (2019). Accreditation, Credentialing, and Quality Improvement in Diagnostic Medical Sonography: A Literature Review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 35(5), 401–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/8756479319838234
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Sulaiman, T. F. T., & Ghadas, Z. A. A. (2021). Corporate governance models for higher educational institutions: An analysis. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29, 149–168. https://doi.org/10.47836/PJSSH.29.S2.11
Twum, F. O., & Peprah, W. K. (2020). The Impact of Service Quality on Students’ Satisfaction. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/V10-I10/7923
Ulker, N., & Bakioglu, A. (2018). An international research on the influence of accreditation on academic quality.Studies in Higher Education, 44(9), 1507–1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1445986
Welsh, R. O. (2021). Assessing the Quality of Education Research Through Its Relevance to Practice: An Integrative Review of Research-Practice Partnerships. Review of Research in Education, 45(1), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20985082
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0966
Zhou, L. L., Bach, A., & Bach, V. (2019). Private universities in Vietnam: Reflection and proposition. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(12), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.12.16
Zilvinskis, J. (2021). The Mediating Effects of Student Services on Engagement Among First-Generation and Transfer Students Who Use Disability Services at Community Colleges. Community College Review, 50(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521211047675
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493