Educators’ Perceptions and Approaches to Environmental Education and Pro-Environmental Behaviour in South African Secondary Schools

Raymond Nkwenti Fru, Thobile Lucia Ndaba

Abstract


Environmental education is taught within the geography curriculum in the basic education system of South Africa.  However, owing to various contextual challenges faced in 21st century South African schools, the teaching of environmental education has remained largely paper based. This poses a challenge to educators who are assigned the responsibility to teach environmental education and foster pro-environmental behaviour in learners. The objective of this study was to investigate how geography educators understand environmental education, as well as  determining the possible reasons for the gap between content knowledge of environmental education principles and learners’ pro-environmental behaviour. This study was conceptualised and articulated using the Tbilisi Principles of Environmental Education (TPEE) of 1978. An interpretivist paradigm was utilised for this study as it supports the qualitative approach of the study. This study was guided by phenomenology. Five geography educators from five non-fee-paying schools were sampled from a population of educators in the Kwa-Mashu Circuit of the Durban Pinetown educational district of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Data was acquired through voice recordings of five semi-structured interviews, which were consequently transcribed non verbatim to eliminate redundancies in the data. The data was analysed thematically according to the Tbilisi Principles, and discussed according to the research questions they satisfy. The findings indicate that educators are failed by a lack of resources to teach environmental education, as well as a curriculum which does not accommodate the teaching of environmental education constructively. The results of this study further revealed obstacles such as a lack of interest from geography learners, which then increases educators’ challenges when teaching environmental education. It is  recommended that the National Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) document be revised to include environmental education constructively within grade 11 geography. This can be done by allocating teaching time specifically for environmental education, as well as ensuring that assessment methods are specific and allocated with resources.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.18


Keywords


environmental education, environmental awareness, pro-environmental behaviour, sustainable development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benavides-Lahnstein, A. I., & Ryder, J. (2020). School teachers’ conceptions of environmental education: Reinterpreting a typology through a thematic analysis. Environmental Education Research, 26(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1687649

Boiyo, V., Koech, M., & Manguriu, D. (2015). Environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour among students: A case study of Kibera and Kasarani Division in Nairobi, Kenya. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, 3(1), 50-59. https://www.researchpublish.com/upload/book/Environmental%20Attitudes%20and%20Ecological%20Behaviour%20among%20Students-1046.pdf

Bopape, J. (2006). Professional development of teachers for effective environmental education (Doctoral dissertation).

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Oxon.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publishing.

Dada, D. O., Eames, C., & Calder, N. (2017). Impact of environmental education on beginning preservice teachers’ environmental literacy. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33(3), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2017.27

Daniels, H. (2004). Activity theory, discourse and Bernstein. Educational Review, 56(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031910410001693218

De Beer, J. J. J., Dreyer, J. M., Hattingh, J. P., Irwin, P. R., Le Grange, L. L. L., Le Roux, C. S., Lotz-Sisitka, H., & Schulze, S. (2014). Environmental education and education for sustainability: Some South African perspectives. Van Schaik.

Dube, C. (2014). Environmental concerns in the geography curriculum: Perceptions of South African high school teachers. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 30, 130-146. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sajee/article/view/121972

Elmassah, S., Biltagy, M., & Gamal, D. (2022). Framing the role of higher education in sustainable development: A case study analysis. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(2), 320-355.

Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press.

Fien, J., & Maclean, R. (2000). Teacher education for sustainability. In K. A. Wheeler & A. P. Bijur (Eds.). Education for a sustainable future (pp. 91-111). Springer.

Hashim, N. H., & Jones, M. L. (2007). Activity theory: A framework for qualitative analysis. https://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/408/-

Hebe, H. N. (2009). An evaluation of the environmental literacy of educators: A case study (Doctoral dissertation).

Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743

Kara, H. (2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Policy Press.

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.

Maharajh, L. R., Nkosi, T., & Mkhize, M. C. (2016). Teachers’ experiences of the implementation of the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) in three primary schools in KwaZulu Natal. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 4(3), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v4i3.120

Maila, M. W. (2001). The assessment of learning programmes for the senior phase at environmental education centres in Mpumalanga (Doctoral dissertation).

Manik, S. (2020). (En)viable attempts at addressing education for sustainable development through new geography textbooks in post-apartheid South Africa. Berghahn Books, 30(2), 621-638. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43057366

McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597

Msezane, S. B. (2020). Positioning of environmental education in life sciences (Grade 12). Ecology, Environmental and Conservation, 26(4), 1450-1458. http://www.envirobiotechjournals.com/EEC/v26i420/EEC-2.pdf

Ndimande, B. S. (2012). Race and resources: Black parents’ perspectives on post-apartheid South African schools. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15(4), 525-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2011.618832

Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620120065230

Saldanha, G., & O'Brien, S. (2014). Research methodologies in translation studies. Routledge.

Sarantakos, S. (2013). The Palgrave Macmillan social research. Palgrave Macmillan.

Tilbury, D. (1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462950010206

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization – Environmental Programme (UNESCO-UNEP). (1978). Proceedings of an Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education. Tbilisi, USSR, 14–26 October 1977. https://www.gdrc.org/uem/ee/tbilisi.html#:~:text=The%20world's%20first%20intergovernmental%20conference,October%2014%2D26%2C%201977


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493