Paving Ways for Effective Inclusion in Selected Mainstream Secondary Schools in Gauteng Province, South Africa

Appolonia Masunungure, Mbulaheni Maguvhe

Abstract


This study explored mainstream secondary school teachers’ understanding of inclusion from an interpretive paradigm and adopted a qualitative research design. The study used the inclusive pedagogy approach as the theoretical framework which was propounded by Florian, Back-Hawkins, and Rouse which is located in the sociocultural framework. The research was conducted at three selected schools in Gauteng, a province in South Africa. Twelve participants were purposefully sampled using critical case sampling. Data were generated using individual face-to-face interviews, followed by thematic data analysis. The findings of the study show that teachers understand inclusion as the accommodation of all learners, from a disability perspective, as equal treatment and non-discrimination of learners, and as unity in diversity. The study concludes that teachers have different understandings of inclusion with some seeing inclusion from a disability perspective. It is recommended that the government should facilitate teacher development on inclusive education policies and practices through pre-service and in-service training while workshops should enhance teachers’ holistic understanding of the inclusion of learners in mainstream schools. The government should also elucidate policy documents such as the Education White Paper 6: Special Needs Education: Building an Inclusive Education and Training System, and the Screening, Identification, Assessment, and Support document.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.28


Keywords


inclusion; inclusive education; mainstream; secondary schools; teachers’ understanding

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aalatawi, R. (2023). Teachers' Perceptions of the Barriers to Inclusive Education of Kindergarten Students with Disabilities in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.2.19

Adedoyin, O., & Okere, E. (2017). The Significance of Inclusion Concept in the Educational System as Perceived by Junior Secondary School Teachers: Implications for Teacher Training Programmes in Botswana. Global Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 13-28. http://doi.org/ 10.20448/807.3.1.13.28

Agbenyega, J. S., & Klibthong, S. (2014). Assessing Thai early childhood teachers' knowledge of inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(12), 1247-1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.886306

Aisah, A., & AB, D. S. (2019). Islamic Education in The Inclusive School: Experimental Study of The Application of Differentiated Instruction For Slow Learners. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 15(2), 281-301. https://doi 10.18196/AIIJIS.2019.0106.281-301

Black-Hawkins, K. (2014). Researching inclusive classroom practices: The framework for participation. The SAGE handbook of special education, 1, 389-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446282236.n25

Buli-Holmberg, J., & Jeyaprathaban, S. (2016). Effective practice in inclusive and special needs education. International journal of special education, 31(1), 119-134. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1099986.pdf

Department of Basic Education, (2014). Policy on Screening, Identification, Assessment and Support (SIAS). Cape Town. South Africa: Department of Basic Education. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/sias-revised-final-comment.pdf

Department of Education (DoE), (2001). Education White Paper Six: Special Needs Education. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Education. https://www.vvob.org/files/publicaties/rsa_education_white_paper_6.pdf

dos Anjos, F. E. V., Rocha, L. A. O., Pacheco, R., & da Silva, D. O. (2021). Teaching-Learning Strategies to Production Planning and Control Concepts: Application of Scenarios to Sequencing Production with Virtual Reality Support. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(8). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.8.7

Dukpa, D., & Kamenopoulou, L. (2018). The Conceptualisation of Inclusion and Disability in Bhutan. In Inclusive Education and Disability in the Global South (pp. 53-79). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72829-2

Du Plessis, P. (2013). Legislation and policies: Progress towards the right to inclusive education. De Jure, 46 (1),76-92. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC136272

Engelbrecht, P., Nel, M., Smit, S., & Van Deventer, M. (2016). The idealism of education policies and the realities in schools: The implementation of inclusive education in South Africa. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(5), 520-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1095250

Engelbrecht, P., & Savolainen, H. (2018). A mixed-methods approach to developing an understanding of teachers’ attitudes and their enactment of inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(5), 660-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2017.1410327

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2014). Applied thematic analysis. sage publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436

Kamenopoulou, L., & Dukpa, D. (2018). Karma and human rights: Bhutanese teachers’ perspectives on inclusion and disability. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(3), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1365274

Magnússon, G., Göransson, K., & Lindqvist, G. (2019). Contextualizing inclusive education in educational policy: the case of Sweden. Nordic journal of studies in educational policy, 5(2), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2019.1586512

Maguire, M. and Delahunt, B., 2017. Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3). http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335

Maree, K. (2016). First Steps in Research. Van Schaik Publishers, Pretoria

Murungi, L. N. (2015). Inclusive basic education in South Africa: Issues in its conceptualisation and implementation. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 18(1), 3159-3195. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i1.07

Mulyadi, A. W. E. (2017). Policy of inclusive education for education for all in Indonesia. Policy & Governance Review, 1(3), 201-212. https://www.journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/57/29

Pantic, N. & Florian, L. (2015). Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice. Educational Inquiry, 6(3), 331-351. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.27311

Republic of South Africa. (1996). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa South Africa: Government Gazette

Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and teacher education, 67, 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.020

Thanh, N & Thanh, T. (2015). ‘The interconnection between interpretivist paradigm and qualitative methods in education’. American Journal of Educational Science 1(2), 24-27. http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ajes

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Salamanca

Yin, R.K. (2016). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. Second Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.

Young, K., McNamara, P. M., & Coughlan, B. (2017). Authentic inclusion-utopian thinking? –Irish post-primary teachers' perspectives of inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.017


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493