Gender Equality in Science Classrooms: Examining the Implementation of Gender-responsive Approach and its Impact on Science Education

Peter Paul Canuto, Felina Espique

Abstract


Gender-responsive education promotes gender equality at schools and can be attained by addressing students’ gender issues through gender responsiveness. In view of gender equality, the study examined the experiences of two Science teachers in implementing a gender-responsive approach to instruction and its impact on students' learning in secondary Science classrooms. Data were gathered through purposive sampling and descriptive phenomenology, supplemented by follow-up interviews, and then analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological approach. The interviews were conducted through online video calls with a semi-structured questionnaire. With thorough analysis, five major themes emerged from the teachers' shared experiences. These themes pertain to the students' genders and performances, gender-responsive approaches and methodologies, and the effects and challenges of implementing a gender-responsive approach in Science education. Furthermore, the teachers' gender responsiveness was reflected in preparing lessons, instructional materials, gender-fair language, extracurricular activities, a profiling system, sharing, group work and projects, reporting and presentation, problem-solving and laboratory activities, games, and assessments. Consequently, the teachers affirmed that gender equality among Science classroom students was achieved. With the surge of concerns surrounding students' gender, a gender-responsive approach must be upheld. Though the study's results directly relate to Science education, it is hoped that it will contribute to the pedagogical knowledge of teachers in other disciplines in integrating gender and addressing gender issues in the classroom.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.33


Keywords


gender equality; gender responsiveness; gender-responsive approach; Science classrooms; students’ gender issues

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abraha, M., Dagnew, A., & Seifu, A. (2019). Gender responsive pedagogy: Practices, challenges & opportunities - A case of secondary schools of North Wollo Zone, Ethiopia. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 30(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2019/v30i330128

Abraha, M., Seifu, A., & Dagnew, A. (2021). Manifestation of the Fawe’s gender responsive pedagogy in the Ethiopian general secondary school science teaching. International Journal of Management, 12(1), 1560-1571. https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJM/VOLUME_12_ISSUE_1/IJM_12_01_138.pdf

Akbari, O., & Sahibzada, J. (2020). Students’ self-confidence and its impacts on their learning process. American International Journal of Social Science Research, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.46281/aijssr.v5i1.462

Akhigbe, J. N., & Adeyemi, A. E. (2020). Using gender responsive collaborative learning strategy to improve students’ achievement and attitude towards learning science in virtual and hands-on laboratory environment. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(3), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021063948

Ananga, E. D. (2021). Gender responsive pedagogy for teaching and learning: The practice in Ghana’s initial teacher education programme. Creative Education, 12, 848-864. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.124061

Anderson, W. (2019). Comparison of female teachers in primary, secondary, and tertiary education: China and the world. ECNU Review of Education, 2(2), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119853664

Anonuevo, C. A. Q. (2000). An overview of the gender situation in the Philippines. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Philippine Office. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/philippinen/50069.pdf

Barnett-Cooper, D. (2012). A study of the impact of single-gender classes on middle school students in an urban setting [Dissertation, Rowan University]. Rowan Digital Works. Theses and Dissertations, 144. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/144

Beechey, S. N., & Moon, L. C. (2015). Gender in the adoption and implementation of Sex Education Policy. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3(7), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2015.37035

Belal, F. O. (2009). Gender equality in secondary education: A study of girls' educational access and participation in Jordan between 2000 and 2005 [Dissertation, Seton Hall University]. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 439. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/439

Boyd, C. O. (2001). Phenomenology the method. In P.L. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (3rd. ed., pp. 93-122). Jones and Bartlett.

Buchhave, H., & Belghith, N. B. H. (2022, April 11). Overcoming barriers to women’s work in the Philippines. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific/overcoming-barriers-womens-work-philippines#:~:text=On%20several%20fronts%2C%20the%20Philippines,gender%20gap%20closed%20to%20date

Christensen, M., Welch, A., & Barr, J. (2017). Husserlian descriptive phenomenology: A review of intentionality, reduction and the natural attitude. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 7(8), 113. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v7n8p113

Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in health sciences. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e566732013-001

Department of Education. (2017, June 29). DO 32, S. 2017 – Gender-Responsive Basic Education Policy. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/06/29/do-32-s-2017-gender-responsive-basic-education-policy/

Department of Education. (2021, October 27). DepEd-USAID partnership strengthens digital inclusion, gender equality in basic education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2021/10/27/deped-usaid-partnership-strengthens-digital-inclusion-gender-equality-in-basic-education/

Dickey, M. W. (2014). Gender-specific instructional strategies and student achievement in 5th grade classrooms [Dissertation, University of South Carolina]. University of South Carolina University Libraries Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/2624

Evans, D. K., Akmal, M., & Jakiela, P. (2020, January 17). Gender gaps in education: The long view. Center for Global Development. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/gender-gaps-education-long-view

Galamgam, M. A., Bautista, J., Eblacas, I., & Rosario, E. (2021). An analysis on the implementation of Gender Responsive Basic Education Policy. ASTRA Research Journal, 5. https://aseanresearch.org/downloads/astr/publication/5/3%20GALAMGAM.pdf

Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104

Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x

Hearn, J., & Husu, L. (2011). Understanding gender: Some implications for science and technology. Interdisciplinary Science Review, 36(2), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801811x13013181961301

Hernandez, T. A., & Cudiamat, M. A. (2018). Integrating gender and development (GAD) in the classroom: The case of Lucsuhin National High School, Department of Education-Philippines. KnE Social Sciences, 3(6), 1135. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i6.2430

Holter, M. T., Johansen, A. B., Ness, O., Brinkmann, S., Høybye, M. T., & Brendryen, H. (2019). Qualitative interview studies of working mechanisms in electronic health: Tools to enhance study quality. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.2196/10354

Honigsfeld, A., & Dunn, R. (2003). High school male and female learning-style similarities and differences in diverse nations. Journal of Educational Research, 96(4), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309598809

Jalak, J. T., & Nasri, N. M. (2019). Systematic review: The impact of pedagogy on equity in science education in rural schools. Creative Education, 10(12), 3243–3254. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012248

Kang, J., Hense, J., Scheersoi, A., & Keinonen, T. (2018). Gender study on the relationships between science interest and future career perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1534021

Kollmayer, M., Schultes, M.-T., Lüftenegger, M., Finsterwald, M., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2020). REFLECT – A teacher training program to promote gender equality in schools. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00136

Kulakoglu, B., & Kondakci, Y. (2022). STEM education as a concept borrowing issue: Perspectives of school administrators in Turkey. ECNU Review of Education, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221107390

Langdridge, D. (2017). Phenomenology. The Palgrave handbook of critical social psychology, 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_9

Lee, S. M. (2021). Exploring gender-responsive pedagogy for STEM education. IISRR- International Journal of Research, 7(II). http://www.iisrr.in/mainsite/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/6.-Shok-Mee-LEE-Exploring-Gender-Responsive-Pedagogy-for-STEM-Education.pdf

Lester, S. (1999). An introduction to phenomenological research. Stan Lester Developments, Taunton. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255647619_An_introduction_to_phenomenological_research

Magnusson, E., & Marecek, J. (2015). Introduction. In Doing inter interview-based qualitative research: A learner's guide (pp. 1-9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107449893.001

Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019). The gender gap in STEM fields: The impact of the gender stereotype of math and science on secondary students’ career aspirations. Frontiers in Education, 4(60). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00060

Matua, G. A., & Van Der Wal, D. M. (2015). Differentiating between descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches. Nurse Research, 22(6), 22-7. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.6.22.e1344

Meinck, S., & Brese, F. (2019). Trends in gender gaps: Using 20 years of evidence from TIMSS. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0076-3

Mihajlovi? Trbovc, J., & Hofman, A. (2015). Toolkit for integrating gender-sensitive approach into research and teaching. https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/garcia_toolkit_gender_research_teaching.pdf

Mitchell, A., & Mitchell, A. (2019). Gender diversity and LGBTQ inclusion in K-12 through higher education. Psychology, 10, 1595-1598. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.1012104

Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643-644. https://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/26984/1/

Nishimura, M. (2017). Effect of school factors on gender gaps in learning opportunities in rural Senegal: Does school governance matter? JICA Research Institute, 141. https://jicari.repo.nii.ac.jp/index.php?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=803&item_no=1&attribute_id=9&file_no=1&page_id=13&block_id=21

Paqueo, V. B., & Orbeta, A. C. Jr. (2019). Gender equity in education: Helping the boys catch up. PIDS Discussion Paper Series. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/211075

Philippine Commission on Women (PCW). (2014). Women’s Empowerment, Development and Gender Equity Plan 2013 – 2016. https://pcw.gov.ph/womens-empowerment-development-and-gender-equality-plan-2013%E2%88%922016/

Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137

Sarabi-Asiabar, A., Jafari, M., Sadeghifar, J., Tofighi, S., Zaboli, R., Peyman, H., Salimi, M., & Shams, L. (2014). The relationship between learning style preferences and gender, educational major and status in first year medical students: A survey study from Iran. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.18250

Schalkwyk, J. (2000). Questions about culture, gender equality and development cooperation. Canadian International Development Agency, Gender Equality Division. https://www.oecd.org/dac/gender-development/1850708.pdf

Severiens, S., & Dam, G. T. (1997). Gender and gender identity differences in learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17(1–2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170105

Shayan, Z. (2015). Gender inequality in education in Afghanistan: Access and barriers. Open Journal of Philosophy, 5(5), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2015.55035

Smith, J. A. (1994). Towards reflexive practice: Engaging participants as co-researchers or co-analysts in psychological inquiry. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 4(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2450040405

Toraman, C., & Ozen, F. (2019). An investigation of the effectiveness of the gender equality course with a specific focus on faculties of education. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 14(2), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2019.201.1

United States Agency for International Development (USAID). (2017, October). A guide for strengthening gender equality and inclusiveness in teaching and learning materials in Asia. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00N86G.pdf

Wigati, I. (2019). The social aspects of gender-responsiveness in schools. Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender, 14(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.21580/sa.v14i2.4523

Zhu, G., Zhang, A., Cheng, L., Shi, K., & Wang, Y. (2022). “Saving Our Boys!”: Do Chinese boys have a masculinity crisis? ECNU Review of Education, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221113594


Refbacks



e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493