Learning from each other: Dialogical Argumentation in an Online Environment

Anita Chadha, Renée B. Van Vechten

Abstract


This research builds upon past work exploring how an online academic website can provide a learning environment in which students engage in dialogic argumentation by voicing their diverse perspectives, challenging their peers through counterarguments, and articulating their positional differences. Drawing from two semesters of data from an academic website populated by three classes, we analyze 375 peer-to-peer responses for their argumentative interactions. Using a mixed methods approach, we find statistically significant evidence that argumentative interactions lead to deeper engagement across the classes. This study concludes that online discussions—a form of computer mediated communication (CMC)—are an innovative means to advance e-learning, a concern for educators across disciplines.


Keywords


Argumentation; Online deliberation; Online teaching; Dialogic argumentation; Computer-mediated communication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.). (2013). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Springer Science & Business Media 1. 33-56.

Bell, P. (2004). Promoting students’ argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom. Internet environments for science education, 3. 115-143.

Bender, T. (2012). Discussion-based online teaching to enhance student learning: Theory, practice and assessment. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain.

Blount, A. G. (2006). Critical reflection for public life: How reflective practice helps students become politically engaged. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(3), 271-283.

Chadha, A. (2017a). Learning to Learn: Lessons from a Collaboration. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 17(3), 34-47.

Chadha, A. (2017b). E-Learning Opens Doors to the Online Community: Lessons from a Longitudinal Study. National social science association, 45.

Chadha, A. (2017c). Comparing Student Reflectiveness in Online Discussion Forums across Modes of Instruction and Levels of Courses. Journal of educators online 14 (2), 1-19.

Chu, H. C., Chen, J. M., & Tsai, C. L. (2017). Effects of an online formative peer-tutoring approach on students’ learning behaviors, performance and cognitive load in mathematics. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 203–219. doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1276085

Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. D. (2007). Personallyâ€seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 253-277.

Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. D. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45: 293-321.

Coirier, P., & Golder, C. (1993). Writing argumentative text: A developmental study of the acquisition of supporting structures. European journal of psychology of education, 8(2), 169-181.

Collins, L. (2014). How online learning enables personalized learning. Getting Smart. Retrieved fromhttp://gettingsmart.com/2014/03/online-learning-enables-personalized-learninginterview-dr-lisa-collins/

Cooper, J. (2001). Peer learning in law: using a group journal. In D. Boud., R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in higher education: Learning from & with each other (pp. 115–127). London, UK: Stylus Publishing Inc.

Dehler, C., & Porras-Hernandez, L. H. (1998). Using Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) to Promote Experiential Learning in Graduate Studies. Educational Technology, 38(3), 52-55.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). Tapping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science education, 88(6), 915-933.

Gordon, R. & Connor, R. (2011). Team based learning in management education. In D. Boud, R. Cohen. R., J. & Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in higher education: Learning from & with each other (pp. 85–98). London, UK: Stylus Publishing Inc.

Hakkinen, P. (2013). Multiphase method for analyzing online discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 547-555.

Herring, Susan. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(2), 3–31. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-415040-9.50121-4

Jacoby, B. (2009). Civic engagement in higher education. Concepts and practices. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 708-721.

Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and instruction, 15(3), 287-315.

Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child development, 74(5), 1245-1260.

Lane, D. R. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in the classroom: Asset or liability. In Workshop presented.

Lee, M. J., & McLoughlin, C. (2007). Teaching and learning in the Web 2.0 era: Empowering students through learner-generated content. International journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 4(10), 21-34.

Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human development, 43(6), 332-360.

Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and instruction, 14(2), 139-178.

Resnick, L. B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C. M., Wathen, S. H., & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and instruction, 11(3-4), 347-364.

Rowntree, D. (1995). Teaching and learning online: a correspondence education for the 21st century? British Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 205-215.

Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). An experimental test of processes underlying self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2).

Schwarz, B. B., & De Groot, R. (2007). Argumentation in a changing world. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 297-313.

Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 2(4), 421-447

Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297-323.

Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Vechten, R. B. (2013). He Said/She Said: Tracking Gender Differences in Online Academic Discussions. Paper presented at the APSA teaching and learning conference.

Van Vechten, R. B. and Chadha, A. (2013). How students talk to each other: Findings from an academic social networking project. Teaching civic engagement: From student to active citizen, 167-188.

Wilson, J. T. (2001) Project management teams: A model of best practice in design. In D. Boud., R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in higher education: Learning from & with each other (pp. 99–114). London, UK: Stylus Publishing Inc.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493