Insights into the Dynamic Relationship between Technology and Task-Based Language Teaching: A Critical Review
Abstract
The advent of new technologies and educational tools, while undoubtedly exciting, can often lead their being a mere source of entertainment unless their design, deployment and assessment are grounded in the principles of educational and language development. The task-based language teaching approach, along with its theoretical premises in task-based language learning, offers an excellent opportunity to leverage the potential of technological advancements to create an engaging and effective language-learning process. This approach not only produces high-quality results but also instills a sense of validity and importance that extends beyond the confines of the classroom. Task-based language teaching has garnered significant attention from academicians in language education and second language acquisition from the 1980s. Current literature on task-based language teaching highlights its theoretical concepts and real-world application in foreign and second language teaching, which is continually growing. The integration of learning technology into task-based language teaching has the potential to instill confidence and motivation in learners and open a path for them to use their second language skills effectively in real-world situations, which is crucial in the twenty-first century. This analysis aims to examine the relationship between technology and task-based language teaching. It explores how technology affects task-based language teaching and vice versa, while also addressing the difficulties that arise when using task-based language teaching in technology-based contexts. Furthermore, this review illustrates a range of crucial aspects that require attention to further the development of technology-enhanced task-based language teaching.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.19
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrams, Z. I. (2006). From theory to practice: Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom. Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching, 5, 181-209.
Anwar, K., & Arifani, Y. (2016). Task Based Language Teaching: Development of CALL. International Education Studies, 9(6), 168-183. http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n6p168
Appel, C., & Guerrero, R. G. (2006). Finding common ground in LSP: A computer-mediated communication project. Information technology in languages for specific purposes: Issues and prospects, 75-90. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-28624-2_5
Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 525-545. http://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00159
Beauvois, M. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2), 198-217. http://doi.org/10.3138/CMLR.54.2.198
Belz, J. A. (2006). At the intersection of telecollaboration, learner corpus analysis, and L2 pragmatics: Considerations for language program direction. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10125/69625
Belz, J., & Vyatkina, N. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked inter-cultural language study: The case of German modal particles. Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(1), 17-48.
Black, R. W. (2006). Language, culture, and identity in online fanfiction. E-learning and Digital Media, 3(2), 170-184. http://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2006.3.2.170
Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 19–43. http://dx.doi.org/10125/25002
Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17-31. http://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)90037-X
Chung, Y. G., Graves, B., Wesche, M., & Barfurth, M. (2005). Computer-mediated communication in Korean-English chat rooms: Tandem learning in an international languages program. Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(1), 49-86. http://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.62.1.49
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/doughty/default.html
Ducate 1, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9-28. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701865474
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford university press. http://doi.org/10.4000/apliut.3696
Ellis, R. (2009). Task?based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International journal of applied linguistics, 19(3), 221-246. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
Ellis, R. (2022). Task-Based Language Teaching: Early Days, Now and into the Future. In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment: Contemporary Reflections from Across the World (pp. 39-61). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5_4
Fuchs, C. (2009). Computer-mediated task design: Language student teachers' expectations and realizations. LETRAS, 25(2). http://doi.org/10.30920/letras.25.2
González-Lloret, M. (2014). The need for needs analysis in technology-mediated TBLT. Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks, 6, 23-50. http://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.6.02gon
González-Lloret, M.(2008). Computer-mediated learning of L2 pragmatics. Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing, 30, 114-132. http://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690869-008
Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105-121. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344006000711
Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2004). Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/hampel/default.html
Kenning, M. M. (2010). Differences that make the difference: A study of functionalities in synchronous CMC. ReCALL, 22(1), 3-19. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344009990164
Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern language journal, 79(4), 457-476. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
K?l?çkaya, F., & Latoch-Zielinska, J. K. M. (2014). E-learning in foreign language instruction in Turkey: Curriculum models and course design guidelines. U?ak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(3), 165-185. http://doi.org/10.12780/uusbd243
Kramsch, C., & Steffensen, S. V. (2008). Ecological perspectives on second language acquisition and socialization. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 8, 17-28. http://doi.org/10.1007/springerreference_60103
Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. L. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In Globalization and language teaching (pp. 83-100). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203193679-12
Lai, C., Zhao, Y., & Wang, J. (2012). Task-Based Language Teaching in Online Ab Initio Foreign Language Classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 81–103. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01271.x
Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL quarterly, 34(3), 457-482. http://doi.org/10.2307/3587739
Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44-65. http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/lam/default.html
Lamy, M. N. (2004). Oral conversations online: Redefining oral competence in synchronous environments. ReCALL, 16(2), 520-538. http://doi.org/10.1017/s095834400400182x
Lamy, M. N. (2007). Interactive task design: Metachat and the whole learner. In Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 242-264. http://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599286-015
Lamy, M. N. (2009). Multimodality in second language conversations online: Looking for a methodology. http://edutice.archives-ouvertes.fr/edutice-00387133
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm027
Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2004). A task-cycling pedagogy using stimulated reflection and audio-conferencing in foreign language learning. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/levy/default.html
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. Modelling and assessing second language acquisition, 18(1), 77-99.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of second language acquisition. http://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3
Mulyadi, D., Wijayatingsih, T., Budiastuti, R., Ifadah, M., & Aimah, S. (2020). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge of ESP teachers in blended learning format. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(6), 124-139. http://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i06.11490
Mulyono, H. (2016). Using Quipper as an online platform for teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Teaching English with Technology, 16(1), 59-70. http://tewtjournal.org
Murray, L., & Hourigan, T. (2008). Blogs for specific purposes: Expressivist or socio-cognitivist approach? ReCALL, 20(1), 82-97. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344008000719
O'Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the "other side": Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/odowd/default.html
Ortega, L. (2009, September). Task and technology in language learning: Elective affinities and (dis) encounters. In Plenary delivered at the 3rd International Task-Based Language Teaching Conference. Lancaster, UK. http://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.1.17wha
Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO journal, 7-32. http://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v20i1.7-32
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy (Vol. 20). Oxford: Oxford university press. http://doi.org/10.2307/3587293
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2010). The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design. In N. Harwood (Ed.), Materials in ELT: Theory and practice (pp. 58-80). Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10179/1877
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596429
Sauro, S. (2004). Cyberdiscursive tug-of-war: Learner repositioning in a multimodal CMC environment. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics (WPEL), 19(2), 3. http://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/vol19/iss2/3
Seedhouse, P., & Almutairi, S. (2009). A holistic approach to task?based interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 311-338. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00243.x
Skehan, P. (2003). Focus on form, tasks, and technology. Computer assisted language learning, 16(5), 391-411. http://doi.org/10.1076/call.16.5.391.29489
Smith, B. (2008). Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num1/smith/default.html
Smith, B. (2009). Task-based learning in the computer-mediated communicative ESL/EFL classroom. CALL-EJ Online, 11(1). http://callej.org/journal/11-1/smith.html
Smith, B. (2010). Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. Directions and prospects for educational linguistics, 79-97. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9136-9_6
Stockwell, G. & Harrington, M. W. (2003). The incidental development of L2 proficiency in NS-NNS email interactions. CALICO Journal, 20, 337-359. Retrieved from http://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=326
Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 24(4), 491-501. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00044-9
Tananuraksakul, N. (2016). Blended e-learning as a requirement for teaching EFL in a Thai academic context. Teaching English with Technology, 16(4), 48-55. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00170-4
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in inter-cultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/default.html
Thorne, S. L. (2006). Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education research. Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education, 2-30.
Ware, P. D., & O’Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 43-63. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num1/wareodowd/default.html
Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 69-87. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/pdf/warner.pdf
Warschauer, M. (2001). Millennialism and media: Language, literacy, and technology in the 21st century. Aila Review, 14(1), 49-59. Retrieved from http://publikationen.ub.unifrankfurt.de/opus4/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/15253/file/Aila14.pdf
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Addison Wesley Longman. http://doi.org/10.2307/3588204
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493