Lecturers’ Beliefs and Agency about Active Learning in English For Specific Purposes Classes

Huan Buu Nguyen

Abstract


This paper examines how English for Specific Purposes lecturers changed their teaching strategies that align with their beliefs about active learning at a Vietnamese university. There is a growing interest in making changes in tertiary instructional practices to involve students in active learning in response to increasing international contexts. Significant reforms of higher education in Vietnam have called for the quality of education, particularly foreign language teaching and learning. Thus, it requires teachers to change not only thinking about new instructional ways but also role shift in improving student learning. However, there is a paucity of research into how science lecturers perceive their practice changes as improving student learning in interactive and dynamic ways. This paper draws on data collected as part of a qualitative action research study including interviews, classroom observations, and planning meetings over three-semester periods. The focus of this study is on the data which examined how five lecturers perceived and implemented active learning strategies. The findings indicate lecturers’ positive beliefs about the change process and their growing awareness of the need for role changes in their practices, thereby associating change with their agency in the change process. Pedagogical implications for policymakers and ESP lecturers are also considered.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.6


Keywords


agency; active learning; ESP; beliefs; change process

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alsharif, D., & Shukri, N. (2018). Exploring pedagogical challenges of ESP teachers at a Saudi Arabian university. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 8(10), 841-855. http://dx.doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2018.810.841.855

Armbruster, P., Patel, M., Johnson, E., & Weiss, M. (2009). Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 203-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-03-0025

Arthurs, L. A., & Kreager, B. Z. (2017). An integrative view of in-class activities that enable active learning in college science classroom settings. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2073-2091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1363925

Auster, E. R., & Wylie, K. K. (2006). Creating active learning in the classroom: A systematic approach. Journal of Management Education, 30(2), 333-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1052562905283346

Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational motivation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 192-215.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

Bandura, A., Davidson, F. W., & Davidson Films. (2003). Bandura's social cognitive theory an introduction [[videorecording] 1 videodisc (37 min.)]. Bendigo, Vic.: VEA.

Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and options in English for Specific Purposes: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189. http://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252

Belcher, D. (2004). Trends in teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 165-186.

Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2017). Talking about education: Exploring the significance of teachers' talk for teacher agency. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 38-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205143

Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives Book 1: Cognitive domain: Longman.

Boesdorfer, S. B., Del Carlo, D. I., & Wayson, J. (2019). Secondary science teachers' reported practices and beliefs on teaching and learning from a large national sample in the United States. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(8), 815-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1604055

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ERIC Digests.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.

Calvert, L. (2016). The power of teacher agency. Journal of Staff Development, 37(2), 51-56.

Capel, S., Leask, M., & Turner, T. (Eds.). (2009). Learning to teach in the secondary school: A companion to school experience. London, New York: Routledge.

Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd Ed.) (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.

Craig, D. V. (2009). Action research essentials. California: Jossey-Bass.

Cronin-Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 235-250.

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.

Drever, E. (1997). Using semi-structured interviews in small scale research: A teacher guide. Glasgow: Scottish Council for Research in Education.

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, A. (2009). From the systemic to the relational: Rational agency and activity theory. In A. L. Sannino, H. Daniels & K. D. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and Expanding with activity theory (pp. 197-211). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change: Developing teachers and teaching: Open University Press.

Feryok, A. (2008). The impact of TESOL on maths and science teachers. ELT Journal, 62(2), 123-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl054

Feryok, A. (2012). Activity theory and language teacher agency. The Modern Language Journal, 96(1), 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01279.x

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Gillham, B. (2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques. New York, NY: Open University Press.

Hall, L. A. (2005). Teachers and content area reading: Attitudes, beliefs and change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 403-414. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.009

Hansen, S. (2004). An investigation of English teacher efficacy beliefs: Subject-specificity, subject-congruency, and associated factors. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Harrop, D., & Turpin, B. (2013). A study exploring learners' informal learning space behaviors, attitudes, and preferences. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(1), 58-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2013.740961

Holland, D., Lachicotte Jr., W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (6th Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learner-centred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Inden, R. B. (2000). Imagining India. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Kazempour, M. (2008). Exploring attitudes, beliefs, and self-efficacy of pre-service elementary teachers' enrolled in a science methods course and factors responsible for possible changes. (Ph.D.), Indiana University.

Keyser, M. W. (2000). Active learning and cooperative learning: Understanding the difference and using both styles effectively. Research Strategies, 17, 35-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0734-3310(00)00022-7

Khan, M. O. (2020). Necessity of ESP (English for Specific Purposes) courses for medical and science students at Najran University, Saudi Arabia: An exploratory-cum remedial study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(2), 208-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1002.09

Kırkgöz, Y., & Dikilitaş, K. (2018). Key issues in English for Specific Purposes in higher education (Vol. 2). Switzerland: Springer.

Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czeniak, C. M. (2000). Assessing teachers' beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 275-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(200003)37:3%3C275::aid-tea4%3E3.0.co;2-2

Martin, A., Park, S., & Hand, B. (2019). What happens when a teacher's science belief structure is in disequilibrium? Entangled nature of beliefs and practice. Research in Science Education, 49, 885-920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9644-0

McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2010). You and your action research project (3rd Ed.): Routledge.

Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Ministry of Education and Training. (2008). Teaching and learning foreign languages in the national education system from 2008 to 2020. Hanoi: Vietnam Retrieved from Retrieved from http://tailieu.vn/doc/de-an-day-va-hoc-ngoai-ngu-trong-he-thong-giao-duc-quoc-dan-1331102.html.

Mintzes, J. J., & Walter, E. M. (2020). Active learning in college science. California, CA, USA: Springer.

Moore, F. M. (2008). Agency, identity, and social justice education: Preservice teachers' thoughts on becoming agents of change in urban elementary science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 5(38), 589-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9065-6

Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.

Nguyen, H. B. (2013). Beliefs about support for teacher change in English for Specific Purposes university classes. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 36-48.

Nguyen, H. B. (2014). Teacher change in science education in a Vietnamese university. (Ph.D.), Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Nguyen, H. B., Haworth, P., & Hansen, S. (2019). Challenging ESP teacher beliefs about active learning in a Vietnamese university. Teacher Development, 23(3), 345-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2019.1598481

Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change: Pearson Education Limited.

Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588214

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307

Pajares, M. F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543

Pham, N. T. (2010). The higher education reform agenda: A vision for 2020. In G. Harman, M. Hayden & T. N. Pham (Eds.), Reforming higher education in Vietnam: Challenges and priorities (Vol. 29, pp. 51-64): Springer.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. London: Bloomsbury.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Ramirez, C. G. (2015). English for Specific Purposes: Brief history and definitions. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 23, 379-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rlm.v0i23.22359

Savin-Baden, M. (2008). Learning spaces: Creating opportunities for knowledge construction in academic life: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, The McGraw-Hill companies.

Simpson, A., Sang, G., Wood, J., Wang, Y., & Ye, B. (2018). A dialogue about teacher agency: Australian and Chinese perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 316-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.002

Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x

Stringer, E. (2008). Action research in education (2nd Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Strubbe, L. E., Stang, J., Holland, T., Sherman, S. B., & Code, W. (2019). Faculty adoption of active learning strategies via paired teaching: Conclusions from two science departments. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(1), 31-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst19-049-01-31

Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.010

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.

Usher, E. L., & Pajares, M. F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751-796. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456

Water, J. G., & Gerson, H. (2007). Teachers' personal agency: Making sense of slope through additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(2), 203-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9048-y

Watters, N. (2014). An exploration of the concept and practice of active learning in higher education. (Ph.D.), University of Glasgow, UK.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Willis, J., McGraw, K., & Graham, L. (2019). Conditions that mediate teacher agency during assessment reform. English Teaching Practice and Critique, 18(2), 233-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-11-2018-0108


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493