Using Knowledge Space Theory to Delineate Critical Learning Paths in Calculus

Iman C Chahine, Mark Grinshpon

Abstract


This study examined the effects of using tutorials in pre-calculus content on college students’ performance in Calculus 1 as measured by the levels of conceptual development delineated through critical learning paths based on their achievement scores and quizzes. Our main objective is to provide evidence that a strong grounding in pre-calculus concepts is necessary for students’ success in Calculus and beyond. We employed Knowledge Space Theory (KST) to analyze data collected on a set of calculus questions that reflect different levels of conceptual development. These calculus questions were given to a group of students enrolled in calculus classes at a Southeastern urban university in the United States. Three tests were examined and the knowledge states were extracted for each test (using Visual Basic software) and knowledge trees were constructed (using an R package) to determine students’ critical learning paths. The findings of this study revealed that critical learning paths supported evidence that a strong foundation in Precalculus is necessary for students’ success in Calculus and beyond. Juxtaposing the succession of knowledge states and critical learning paths reflected student understanding of the basic calculus concepts and proposed a systematic approach to supplemental enrichment and remediation.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.8


Keywords


Knowledge space theory; Precalculus; Calculus teaching; Critical learning paths; Problem-based learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arasasingham, R. D., Taagepera, M., Potter, F., Martorell, I., & Lonjers, S. (2005). Assessing the effect of web-based learning tools on student understanding of Stoichiometry using knowledge space theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(8), 1251.

Berkaliev, Z. & Kloosterman, P. (2009). Undergraduate engineering majors' beliefs about mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 109,175–182.

Bishop-Clark, C., Hurn, J., Perry, S., Freeman, M., Jernigan, M., Wright, F., & Weldy, N. (2010). High school teachers teaching college courses to career technical education students: A story of success. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 25(2), 78-93.

Bonne, L., & Johnston, M. (2016). Students’ beliefs about themselves as mathematics learners. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 17- 28.

Bressoud, D. M., Carlson, M.P., Mesa, V., & Rasmussen, C. (2013). The calculus students: Insights from the Mathematical Association of America national study, International Journal of Mathematica Education in Science and Technology, 44(5), 685-698. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.798874

Cardetti, F., & McKenna, P. J. (2011). In their own words: Getting pumped for Calculus. Primus, 21(4), 351-363.

Carlson, M., Oehrtman, M., & Engelke, N. (2010). The Precalculus Concept Assessment: A tool for assessing students’ reasoning abilities and understanding, Cognition and Instruction 28(2), 113-145

Crouch, R., & Haines, C. (2004). Mathematical modeling: Transitions between the real world and the mathematical world. International Journal on Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 35(2), 197-206.

Doignon, J., & Falmagne, J. (2015). Knowledge spaces and learning spaces. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284579542_Knowledge_Spaces_and_Learning_Spaces

Falmagne, J., Koppen, M., Villano, M., Doignon, J., & Johannesen, L. (1990). Introduction to knowledge spaces: How to build, test, and search them. Psychological Review, 97(2), 201-224. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.201

Ganter, S. L. (2001). Changing calculus: A report on evaluation efforts and national impact from 1988 to 1998 (Vol. 56). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Ganter, S. L., & Haver, W. E. (2011). Partner discipline recommendations for introductory college mathematics and the implications for college algebra. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Karaali, G. (2011). An evaluative Calculus project: Applying Bloom's Taxonomy to the Calculus classroom. Primus, 21(8), 719-731.

Kay, R., & Kletskin, I. (2010). Evaluating the use of learning objects for improving Calculus readiness. Journal of Computers in Mathematics And Science Teaching, 29(1), 87-104.

Kena, G., Musu-Gillette, L., Robinson, J., Wang, X., Rathbun, A., Zhang, J., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Barmer, A., & Dunlop Velez, E. (2015). The Condition of Education 2015 (NCES 2015-144). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC. Retrieved [date] from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

Klymchuk, S., Zverkova, T., Gruenwald, N., & Sauerbier, G. (2010). University students' difficulties in solving application problems in Calculus: Student perspectives. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 81-91.

Naidoo, K., & Naidoo, R. (2007). First-year students’ understanding of elementary concepts in differential calculus in a computer teaching environment. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 4(8), 99-114.

National Science Board. (2018a). Science and engineering indicators 2018. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/

National Science Board. (2018b). Higher education in science and engineering report. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report

National Science Foundation. (NSF) (2018). S &E degrees: 2000-2017. Retrieved from https://nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/higher-education-in-science-and-engineering/undergraduate-education-enrollment-and-degrees-in-the-united-states

National Science Foundation. (NSF) (2018). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/data

Pilgrim, M. E. (2010). A concept for calculus intervention: Measuring student attitudes toward mathematics and achievement in calculus (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University, Colorado.

Rajagukguk, W. (2016). Some factors affected student's calculus learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(13), 96-105.

Reinholz, D. L. (2009). An analysis of factors affecting student success in math 160 calculus for physical scientists. (Thesis submitted for Master of Science). Colorado State University, Fort Collins.

Sanghoon, L., Belkasim, S., Chahine, I. C., & Grinshpon, M. (2014). A web application for the Knowledge Space Theory analysis: KST Web. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 3(9). ISSN: 2278-0181.

Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2010). Digest of Education Statistics 2009 (NCES 2010-013). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.

Spoto, A., Stefanutti, L., & Vidotto, G. (2010). Knowledge space theory, formal concept analysis, and computerized psychological assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 342–350.

Stahl, C., & Hockemeyer, C. (2019). Knowledge space theory. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/kst/vignettes/kst.pdf

Steiner, C. M., Nussbaumer, A., & Albert, D. (2009). Supporting self-regulated personalized learning through competence-based Knowledge Space Theory. Policy Futures in Education, 7(6), 645-661.

Tóth, Z., & Ludányi, L. (2007). Using phenomenography combined with knowledge space theory to study students’ thinking patterns in describing an atom. Journal of Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 327-336.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493