Life Sciences Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge When Addressing Socioscientific Issues in The Topic Evolution

Mokgadi Elizabeth Relela, Lydia Mavuru

Abstract


The South African life sciences curriculum envisages a teacher who negotiates through controversial issues in the topic of evolution and helps learners reconcile the content and their religious or cultural aspects. Previous studies have found that teachers are conflicted to teach evolution concepts due to socioscientific issues (SSIs) emanating from sociocultural and religious beliefs and those of their learners. Consequently, the current paper reports a study that sought to establish life sciences teachers’ topic specific pedagogical content knowledge when teaching some concepts in the topic evolution. This is against the backdrop that teachers are conflicted about teaching the theory of evolution. In a qualitative study, an open-ended questionnaire designed to assess science teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Biological socioscientific issues (PCK-BSSIs) was administered to selected 28 life sciences teachers who had taught the topic evolution for some time. The findings showed that the teaching of SSIs in evolution through debates, argumentation, and discussions, provides a platform for learner critical thinking, problem-solving and the ability to make informed decisions. Some teachers failed to realise the need for inclusion of evolution in the curriculum considering its invasive and challenging nature with regards to sociocultural and religious beliefs. Teachers therefore used textbook knowledge without engaging learners. Based on these findings, the researchers recommend that teachers be equipped with not only the pedagogical skills to address controversial issues but should also be developed in the subject matter knowledge. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.15


Keywords


Evolution; life sciences; teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge; socioscientific issues

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aivelo, T., & Uitto, A. (2019). Teachers’ choice of content and consideration of controversial and sensitive 4 issues in teaching of secondary school genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2716-2735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1694195

Alt?n???k, N. E. (2022). Science and politics: The fight for evolution. eLife Magazine, 9 November. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84343

Asghar, A. (2013). Canadian and Pakistani Muslim teachers’ perceptions of evolutionary science and evolution education. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(10), 1-12.

Barnes, M. E., Dunlop, H. M., Sinatra, G. M., Hendrix, T. M., Yi Zheng, §, & Brownell, S. E. (2020). Accepting evolution means you can’t believe in God”: Atheistic perceptions of evolution among College Biology Students. CBE Life Sci Education, 19(ar21), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-05-0106

BouJaoude, S., Asghar, A., Wiles, J. R., Jaber, L., Sarieddine, D., & Alters, B. (2010). Biology professors' and teachers' positions regarding biological evolution and evolution education in a Middle Eastern society. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 979–1000.

Borgerding, L.A., Deniz, H., & Anderson, E. S. (2017). Evolution acceptance and epistemological beliefs of college biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 493-519.

Bossér, U., Lundin, M., Lindahl, M., & Linder, C. (2015). Challenges faced by teachers implementing socio-scientific issues as core elements in their classroom practices. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 159-176.

Cakiroglu, J., & Geban, O. (2016). The effect of explicit-embedded-reflective instruction on scientific literacy. Hrvatski ?asopis za odgoj i obrazovanje,18(2), 351-390.

Cheung, D., & Wong, H.-W. (2010). Measuring teacher beliefs about alternative curriculum designs. Curriculum Journal, 13(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517021013686

Clément, P. (2015). Creationism, science, and religion: A survey of teachers’ conceptions in 30 countries. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 167, 279-287.

Coleman, J., Stears, M., & Dempster, E. (2015). Student teachers’ understanding and acceptance of evolution and the nature of science. South African Journal of Education, 35(2), 1079-1079.

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods approach, 4th Ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Deniz, H., & Borgerding, L.A. (2018). Evolutionary theory as a controversial topic in science curriculum around the globe. In Evolution education around the globe (3-11). Springer, Cham.

Department of Basic Education (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS): Grade 10-12. Life Sciences. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Glaze, A. (2018). From worldviews to classrooms: Framing evolution acceptance in pre-service science teachers in the south-eastern United States. Georgia Educational Researcher, 14(2), 1-12.

Glaze, A. L., Goldston, M.J., & Dantzler, J., (2015). Evolution in the south-eastern USA: Factors influencing acceptance and rejection in pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1189-1209.

Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Lederman, N. G. (2016). The development of an instrument for assessing pedagogical content knowledge for socioscientific knowledge (PCK-SSI). National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). Baltimore, USA.

Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Irez, S. (2017). Biyoloji Ögretmenlerinin Sosyobilimsel Konularla ile llgili Anlay?slar? [Biology teachers' understanding of socioscientific issues]. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 30(2), 833-860.

Hastürk, H. G., & Ökke?o?ullar?, E. (2021), Examination of secondary school students' attitudes towards socioscientific issues. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(2), 513-525.

Hermann, R.S. (2013). On the legal issues of teaching evolution in public schools. The American Biology Teacher, 75(8), 539-543.

Inan, S., Irez, S., Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Cakir, M. (2017). Teaching evolution self-efficacy scale: The development, validation, and reliability study. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 6, 105-108.

Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285

Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A cognitive-load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2

Malcolm, S. A., Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2019). The validity and reliability of an instrument to measure physical science teachers' topic specific pedagogical content knowledge in stoichiometry. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(2), 181-194.

Mavhunga, E. & Rollnick, M. (2016). Can the principles of topic specific PCK be applied across science topics? Teaching PCK in a pre-service programme. In N. Papadouris, A. Hadjigeorgiou & C. P. Constantinou (Eds). Insights from research in science teaching and learning: Book of Selected Papers from the ESERA 2013 Conference, Dordrecht: Springer, 56-72.

Mavuru, L., & Ramnarain, U. (2017). Teachers’ knowledge and views on the use of learners’ socio-cultural background in teaching natural sciences in grade 9 township classes. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 176-186.

Mavuru, L. (2018). Teachers’ views and pedagogical practices when teaching the topic of evolution to grade 12 learners. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/274375

Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2013). Improving PCK of chemical equilibrium in pre-service teachers. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1–2), 113–125.

National Research Council (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Ngxola, N., & Sanders, M. (2008). Teaching evolution in the new curriculum: Life Sciences teachers’ concerns. Proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference of the South African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.

Pretorius, M., & Lioy, D.T. (2021). ‘What do religion and natural science each have to say about origins, creation and evolution?’ HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies, 77(3), a6188. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i3.6188

Reiss, M. J. (2019). Evolution education: treating evolution as a sensitive rather than a controversial issue. Ethics and Education, 14(3), 351-366.

Relela, M., & Mavuru, L. (2021). Life Sciences teachers’ conceptions about socioscientific issues in the topic evolution. A paper presented (virtual) at the International Conference on Education and New Developments (END) 2021, 26-28 June, Porto, Portugal.

Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific Literacy, Science Literacy, and Science Education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Science Education, Routledge Handbooks Online.

Ruse, M. S. (2005). Technology and the evolution of the human: From Bergson to the philosophy of technology. Essays in Philosophy, 6(1), 213-225.

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L., (2009). Science literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909-921.

Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: socio?scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1-42.

Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom (pp. 1-9). Springer: Dordrecht.

Sahingoz, S., & Cobern, W. W. (2020). Science methods course influence on pedagogical orientations of pre-service science teachers. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(1), 114-136.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: A conception of teacher knowledge. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.

Simonneaux, L. (2007). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In Argumentation in science education (179-199). Springer: Dordrecht.

Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: Pedagogical issues. Science & Education, 19(6-8), 539-571.

Stears, M., Clément, P., James, A., & Dempster, E. (2016). Creationist and evolutionist views of South African teachers with different religious affiliations. South African Journal of Science, 112(5/6), Art. #2015-0226. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150226

Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644

Trani, R. (2004). I won't teach evolution; it's against my religion. And now for the rest of the story…. The American Biology Teacher, 66(6), 4.

Tolman, E. R., Ferguson, D. G., Mann, M., Cordero, A. M., & Jensen, J. L. (2020). Reconciling evolution: Evidence from a biology and theology course. Evolution Education Outreach, 13, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-020-00133-9

Yahya, H. (2006). The Atlas of Creation. Istanbul: Global publishing.

Tuithof, H., Van Drie, J., Bronkhorst, L., Dorsman, L., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2021). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of two specific historical contexts captured and compared. Education Sciences, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1877621

Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(49). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684

Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II. Routledge.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493