Malaysian English Language Teachers’ Willingness, Readiness, Needs and Wants to Develop Graphic Oral History ELT Materials
Abstract
Non-native English language teachers have long been de-professionalized being adopters of preponderant globalized English language teaching (ELT) coursebooks that offer an insignificant contribution to their students’ English language learning. This has spurred the design of the “Innovations in Materials Development” (IMD) module to train Malaysian English language teachers in developing graphic oral history ELT materials. This study reports on the initial (needs analysis) phase of the instructional design of the module; not only did the researchers examine the teachers’ willingness and readiness to develop their ELT materials, but they also investigated the teachers’ needs and wants to inform the design of the module. Qualitative findings from in-depth semi-structured individual interviews with five Malaysian in-service English language teachers showed that the teachers are willing to adopt the materials developer role; however, they are not ready as they lack ELT materials development experiences and training. In the context of the prospective module, they need training comprising ELT materials development principles and oral history and graphic novels as pedagogical tools. Moreover, the teachers expressed that they want the training to be practical and to involve group work, guidance, and materials samples. These findings established the need for the IMD module and helped the researchers identify and formulate the specific needs and wants of the teachers for the training to be efficient.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.5
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul Aziz, A., & Makhtar, R. (2021). TESL in-service teachers’ experiences when evaluating an oral history workbook. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 27(3), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2021-2703-04
Abdul Aziz, A., Narayanasamy, J. A. P., Mohamad, M., & Hameed, H. A. (2019). Student-teachers’ experiences in creating oral history texts. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(3), 79?89. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2503-06
Abdul Rahim, H., & Jalalian Daghigh, A. (2020). Neoliberalism in ELT textbooks: An analysis of locally developed and imported textbooks used in Malaysia. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(3), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1755888.
Ahamat, M. & Kabilan, M. (2022). Material Adaptation Among Rural Primary School English Language Teachers. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 28(1), 90-102. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2022-2801-07
Alhamami, M., & Ahmad, J. (2018). EFL Teachers’ Attitudes toward Commercial Textbooks in EFL Programs. Arab World English Journal, 9 (4), 69- 87. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.5
Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.57
Banegas, D. L. (2017). Teacher-developed materials for CLIL: frameworks, sources, and activities. Asian EFL Journal, 19(3), 31-48.
Bouckaert, M. (2019). Current perspectives on teachers as materials developers: Why, what, and how? RELC Journal, 50(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218810549
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Can, T., Frazier, S., McManus, C., & Rey, A. (2020). Glocalisation in action: ‘Less is more’ English coursebook series. Training, Language and Culture, 4(2), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2020-4-2-56-66
Casta, J. S., & Hufana, E. R. (2016). Language functions in ESL textbooks. TESOL International Journal, 11(1), 65–80.
Crystal, D. (2019). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English language (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Don, Z. M., Abdullah, M. H., Abdullah, A. C., Lee, B. H., Kaur, K., Pillai, J., & Hooi, M. Y. (2015). English language education reform in Malaysia: The roadmap 2015–2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.
Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016). Action research to support teachers’ classroom materials development. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1090995
Garton, S., & Graves, K. (2014). Identifying a research agenda for language teaching materials. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2) 654-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12094
Garton, S., & Graves, K. (2021). “Materials in ELT: Looking ahead.” In S. Garton & k. Graves (Eds), International perspective on materials in ELT (pp. 293–303). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Li, M. (2020). Multimodal pedagogy in TESOL teacher education: Students’ perspectives. System, 94, Article 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102337
Holliday, A. (2015). Native-speakerism: Taking the concept forward and achieving cultural belief. In A. Swan, P. Aboshiha, & A. Holliday (Eds.), (En)countering native-speakerism: Global perspectives (pp. 11–25). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ibrahim, S. A. M., Aziz, A. A., Said, N. E. M., & Ismail, H. H. (2022). Using Graphic Oral History Texts to Operationalize the TEIL Paradigm and Multimodality in the Malaysian English Language Classroom. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.12
Idrus, M. M., Ismail, H., Abdullah, H., Baharun, H., Mat Saad, N. S., Darmi, R., Puteh-Behak, F., & Harun, H. (2019). Opening up alternatives to dominant ideological constructions of English language teaching in Malaysia. Changing English, 26(3), 306-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2019.1596738
Johari, N. A., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2019). Teacher’s perceptions on using the PULSE 2 textbook. Journal of Educational Research and Indigenous Studies, 2(1), 1-15.
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge University Press.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2018). Local context-based English lessons: Forging northern Thai knowledge, fostering English vocabulary. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 24(2), 127?142. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2402-10
Kiczkowiak, M. (2022). Are most ELT course book writers white ‘native speakers’? A survey of 28 general English course books for adults. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221123273
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2016). The decolonial option in English teaching: Can the subaltern act? TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.202
Kwon, H. (2020). Graphic novels: Exploring visual culture and multimodal literacy in preservice art teacher education. Art Education, 73(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2019.1695479
Marlina, R. (2018). Teaching English as an international language: Implementing, reviewing, and re-envisioning world Englishes in language education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315315768
Matsuda, A. (2012). Teaching materials in EIL. In L. Alsagoff, S.L. Mckay, G. Hu, & W.A. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203819159
McGrath, I. (2013). Introduction: Materials, the Roles of Teachers and Learners, and Teacher Education. In Teaching Materials and the Roles of EFL/ESL Teachers: Practice and Theory (pp. 1–26). London: Bloomsbury Academic. Retrieved January 24, 2023, from http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472542076.ch-001
McKay, S. L. (2012). Teaching materials for English as an international language. In A. Matsuda (Ed.), Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language (pp. 70–83). https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847697042-007
McKay, S. (2003). Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re-examining common ELT assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00035
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647
Mishan, F. (2022). The Global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella's slipper? Language Teaching, 55(4), 490-505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000646
Montero, M., & Rossi, M. (2012). Exploring oral history methodology as a culturally responsive way to support the writing development of secondary English language learners. Oral History Forum d’histoire Orale, 32, 1–26. http://www.oralhistoryforum.ca/index.php/ohf/article/viewArticle/430
Pennycook, A. (2017). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (2012, March 13). Linguistic imperialism alive and kicking. Guardian Weekly.
Ping, Q. (2018). Ideologies in primary English textbooks in China. In X. Curdt-Christiansen & C.Weninger (Eds.), Language, ideology and education: The politics of textbooks in language education (pp. 163–180). New York: Routledge.
Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing oral history: A practical guide. Oxford University Press.
Seglem, R., & Witte, S. (2009). You gotta see it to believe it: Teaching visual literacy in the English classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(3), 216–226.
Shak, M. S. Y., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Tahir, M. H. M., & Adam, M. H. M. (2021). The use of imported CEFR-aligned English language textbooks in Malaysian schools: Issues and concerns. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9), 954-963. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i9/10875
?im?ek, M. (2017). Confronting culture in local and global English coursebooks: Student teachers’ preferences in materials adaptation. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 13(2), 277–300.
Thornbury, S. (2006). An A to Z of ELT: A dictionary of terms and concepts. Macmillan.
Toledo-Sandoval, F. (2020). Local culture and locally produced ELT textbooks: How do teachers bridge the gap? System, 95(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102362
Tomlinson, B. (ed.). 2013. Developing Materials for Language Teaching (2nd edn). Bloomsbury.
Tomlinson, B. (2014). Teacher growth through materials development. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, Special Issue 3(2): 89–106.
Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2018). The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning. Hoboken, NJ: WILEY Blackwell.
Ulla, M. B. (2019). Western-published ELT textbooks: Teacher perceptions and use in Thai classrooms. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(3), 768–1068. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.3.13.970
Ulla, M. B., & Perales, W.F. (2021). Developing an English Language Teaching Textbook in a Thai University: Classroom Language Teachers as Writers. English Teaching and Learning, 45(4), 461- 476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00078-2
Vanha, L. (2017). Teachers’ perspectives on the role of textbooks in English language learning and teaching in Finland. (Master’s thesis). English Philology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu,Oulu, Finland.
Vettorel, P., & Lopriore, L. (2013). Is there ELF in ELT coursebooks? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 483–504.
Vodniza, G. (2016). Stories that are not told: Everyone has a story, or a story that matters. In E. Shaker (Ed.), Our schools/ourselves: Oral history education, political engagement, and youth. Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493