Investigating the Application of Thematic Progression in EFL Writing: A Systematic Review
Abstract
A systematic literature review was conducted to examine the studies on the application of thematic progression (TP) to EFL writing. Based on three criteria of research relevance, coverage and update frequency(Shaheen,2023), five databases were chosen, covering Web of Science, Scopus, Eric, Google Scholars and ProQuest. A total of 32 research articles published from 2014 to 2023 were categorized and reviewed. The research methodology mainly follows the guidelines of PRISMA to address the three research questions: 1) What are the development trends in TP -based EFL writing studies including research publications, countries and methodologies? 2) How is TP applied to EFL writing? 3)How does TP influence EFL writing performance? It was discovered that in the past decade there was a steady increase and expansion in the number of research articles and the range of research countries and methods. Moreover, different TP patterns were found to have been distributed across six writing types. These TP patterns established stronger relations with and strengthened writing organization, language use, and content. From the above findings, it can be suggested that TP-based EFL writing researches have regained their development momentum. It can also be inferred that the distribution of TP patterns varies from genre to genre and the patterns improve the overall EFL writing performance by enhancing writing organization, content and language use.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.14
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al Bakaa, A. J. (2014). Investigating individual voice in thematic development in academic assignments written by Iraqi and Australian postgraduate students. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 66-84. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v3i1.6710
Alyousef, P., Suleiman, H., & Ahmed Alzahrani, A. (2020). A functional analysis of the thematic organization in electrical engineering research article introductions written in English by native and Saudi scholars: A comparative study. Arab World English Journal,11(2), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3649245
Arientarini, S. W., Fitriati, S. W., & Widhiyanto, W. (2021). Themes and thematic progression ELT forum-JET journal articles. The Journal of Educational Development, 9(2), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.15294/jed.v9i2.68304
Bahang, M. D., Nawun, A. R., Wutun, A. A., & Nurhusain, M. (2021). The use of thematic progression in writing: hortatory exposition text at second grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Elar. The Educational Review, USA, 5(10), 385-390. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2021.10.002
Bangga, L. A. (2021). An investigation of theme and theme progression of students' exposition texts. Indonesian Journal of Functional Linguistics, 1(2), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijsfl.v1i2.43978
Bi, X. (2023). L1 Transfer in Chinese EFL learners’ use of thematic progression in English argumentative writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(2), 362-369. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1302.10
Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2013). The functional analysis of English. Routledge.
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018). CASP systematic review checklist, https://casp-uk.net/checklists/casp-systematic-review-checklist-fillable.pdf (accessed 24 December 2023)
Danes (1974). FUNCTIONAL SENTENCE PERSPECTIVE AND THE ORGANIZATION OF THE TEXT. Papers on functional sentence perspective, edited by Frantisek Danes, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 1974, pp. 106-128. https://doi.org/
10.1515/9783111676524.106
DiMarco, J., & Fasos, S. (2020). Resume content research across disciplines: an analysis of ProQuest from 1984-2018. The Electronic Library, 38(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-07-2019-0175
Dou, W., & Zhao, H. (2019). Thematic progression in the academic writing of non-English major postgraduates in Mainland China. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7-1.https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.11
Devira, M., Makhroji, M., Bania, A. S., & Sari, N. (2020). “Constant, zig-zag linear, or multiple?”: Thematic progression patterns on EFL students’ recount texts. Elite: English and Literature Journal, 7(2), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.24252/10.24252/elite. v7i2a6
Ebrahimi, S. F. (2014). The status of theme in the IELTS task 2 essay. International Journal of English and Education, 3(3), 390-399.
Ebrahimi, S. F., & Ebrahimi, S. J. (2014). Thematic progression patterns in the IELTS task 2 writing. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 3(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v3i3.5219
Fernandez, C. (2019, November 30). Of English teachers then and now. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2012/11/11/of-english-teachers-then-and-now
Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of L2 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
Haji, G. (2023). SFL-based analysis of thematic progression of English graduate personal statements. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(2), 440-453. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6579
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2013). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Hendrawan, W., Sujatna, E. T. S., Krisnawati, E., & Darmayanti, N. (2021). Thematic progression in uncovering paragraph coherence: Some evidences in Indonesian secretarial academy context. TESOL International Journal, 16(1), 179-209. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1329866.pdf
Jacobs, H. L. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA11496557
Jalilifar, A., Alipour, M., & Rabiee, M. (2017). A comparative study of thematicity in the argumentative writing of university EFL students and the introduction section of research articles. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 36(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2017.4043
Keskin, D., & Demir, B. D. K. (2021). The role of theme and rheme in thematic progression patterns in English argumentative essays by Turkish University students. Edu 7: Yeditepe Üniversitesi E?itim Fakültesi Dergisi(Edu 7: Yeditepe University Faculty of Education Journal), 10(12), 64-82.
Munir, S., Afzal, S., & Tazeen, H. (2022, June). Thematic progression: A comparative analysis of social science research articles written by Pakistani and British research scholars. Linguistic Forum-A Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 22-28. http://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2022.4.2.6
Mustofa, M. I., & Kurniawan, E. (2023). Theme and thematic progression in a recount text by an advanced student. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 481-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v7i2.1382
Nguyen, V. T., & Nguyen, T. M. T. (2020). The realization of thematic progression in online IELTS writing task 2 samples in an English-learning website: A case study. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(6), 134. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4634
Nurdianti, D., Pahamzah, J. &Fargianti, Y. (2022). Theme-rheme organization of background section in research proposal introduction. Journal of Linguistics, Literacy, and Pedagogy, 1(2), 71-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jllp.v1i2.17676
Nurdianingsih, F., & Purnama, Y. I. (2017). Thematic progression pattern: A technique to improve students’ writing skill viewed from writing apprehension. Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 2(2), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i2.128
Okta, Z., Ashadi, A., Triyono, S., & Pranowo, D. D. (2023). Thematic structure in students’ writings: Implications on their ideas organization and development. Register Journal, 16(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.49-72
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International journal of surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
Pangestu, G., Harvian, E. D., & Suprijadi, D. (2019). Thematic progression in students’ descriptive texts. Professional Journal of English Education, 2(4), 575-580. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v2i4.p575-580
Rahayu, A. R., Krisnawati, E., & Soemantri, Y. S. (2020). Theme and thematic progression in narrative texts of Indonesian EFL learners. International Journal of English, Literature and Social Science, 5(3), 812–817. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.53.36
Riazi, M., Ghanbar, H., & Rezvani, R. (2023). Qualitative data coding and analysis: A systematic review of the papers published in the journal of second language writing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2023.121271
Robbins, J. B. (2001). ERIC: Mission, structure, and resources. Government Information Quarterly, 18(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-624x(00)00062-9
Rustipa, K., Soepriatmadji, L., Purwanto, S., & Pukan, E. O. (2022). Students’ doing thematic development and concept map analyses to enhance EFL students’ textual competence. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 2586-2605.
Samsuddin, S. F., Masenwat, N. Z., & Llah, L. A. (2021). Systematic literature review on cultivating reading culture in academic library initiatives. Journal of Academic Library Management (AcLiM), 1(2), 56-74.
Saeed, A., Karim, S., & Mughal, S. H. (2021). The impact of theme-rheme progression method on improving textual coherence and cohesion in L2 writing: A study of L2 learners of English. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(2), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2021.0902.0115
Sari, E. D. P., & Agustina, M. F. (2022). Thematic development in students’ argumentative essay. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 166-174. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2563
Shaheen, N., Shaheen, A., Ramadan, A., Hefnawy, M. T., Ramadan, A., Ibrahim, I., Hassanein, M., Ashour, M. E., & Flouty, O. (2023). Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1268045
Shak, M. S. Y., Ahmad, M. K., Nordin, U. K. U. M., & Ibrahim, N. (2023). Effects of google classroom on ESL/EFL teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 33(2), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.33.2.277289
Sinclair, J., & Carter, R. (2004). Trust the text: language, corpus and discourse. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA67607594
Shi, H., & Aryadoust, V. (2024). A systematic review of AI-based automated written feedback research. ReCALL, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000265
Susilowati, E., Faridi, A., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2022). Thematic structure and thematic progression in research articles published in Scopus-indexed international journals. English Education Journal, 12(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.53229
Struthers, L. (2002). Development of a checklist for evaluating cohesion in writing. University of Northern British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.24124/2002/bpgub219
Trung, N. T., & Hoa, N. T. Q. (2018). An analysis of thematic progression strategies in academic IELTS sample essays. International Journal of Humanities, Philosophy and Language, 1(4), 85-93. http://www.ijhpl.com/PDF/IJHPL-2018-04-12-10.pdf
Ugun, V., & Aziz, A. A. (2020). Systematic review: Writing approaches in the teaching of writing skills. AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 8(2), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol8.2.6.2020
Uçar, S. (2023). A systematic review: An investigation of studies on the use of discourse connectors in Turkish EFL learners’ academic writing. RumeliDE Dilve Edebiyat Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi, (36), 1291-1307.https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1369163
Utomo, A. B., Albaekani, A. K., & Pahlevi, M. R. (2010). Thematic progression of students’ writing descriptive text in junior high school. English Ideas: Journal of English Language Education, 1(1). https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/IDEAS/article
/view/4179
Wang, L. (2023). MALL?based collaborative writing in second language classroom: A systematic review. Future in Educational Research, 1(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.18
Wei, J. (2017). Effects of instruction on Chinese college students' use of thematic progression in English essays. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 84-97. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1139060.pdf
Yang, Y. (2015). On the patterns of thematic progression in the argumentation writing of non-English majors. US-China Foreign Language, 13(3), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8080/2015.03.007
Yunita, S. (2018). Theme and thematic progression in students’ recount texts. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 524-530. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9797
Yuned, R. O. (2016). Thematic progressions of the 2015 TEFLIN article abstracts in applied linguistics. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 1(2), 95-115. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v1i2.4207
Zhai, X., & Razali, A. B. (2023). Triple method approach to development of a genre-based approach to teaching ESL/EFL writing: A systematic literature review by bibliometric, content, and scientometric analyses. SAGE Open, 13(1), 21582440221147255. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221147255
Zhang, Y. (2022). Incorporating peer response with teacher feedback in teaching writing to EFL learners: A literature review. English Language Teaching, 15(3), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n3p48
Zhang, J. (2023). Qualitative systematic review in applied linguistics: A synthesis. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i1.1208
Zou, D., Luo, S., Xie, H., & Hwang, G.J. (2020). A systematic review of research on flipped language classrooms: Theoretical foundations, learning activities, tools, research topics and findings. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1811–1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839502
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493